Increased population that we have observed so far leads people to work harder to be leader. Education systems and production systems have been designed in a way that the leaders should have sophisticated skills to be able to compete in such a crowded and byzantine world. In addition, fastidious and sustainable success is required from the leaders to be able to manage difficulties in such complex business. A nation should guide its new generations to adopt to work together instead of working as a rivals. I will explore the reasons in the following essay.
There is an opposing argument which positions itself at the opposing side. According to this argument, new generations should be able to compete each other because of two reasons. First of all, the natural conditions such as lack of enough resources makes us rivals. In other words, there are not enough resources for everybody who lives in the society, which leads new generations to fight for resources. Secondly, huge amount of human resources available in the job market forces the new generations to work as an enemy. To explain in a detailed way, if a employee doesn’t provide sufficient outcomes related to their jobs, they can be easily replaced with a new worker. As a result, new generations should have skills to fight for their futures.
In contrast to the opposing argument, modern world has become more complex since the first industrial revolution. Global supply chains which have been pervasively used borns more complicated problems. As a result, trying to solve problemsa alone without getting help from the outside has become waste of time. Modern workers should be able to form balanced business structures to work together instead of digging alone. For example, supply chain managers are now dealing with big-scaled problems such as inventory management and routing optimizations. Furthermore, they are now in a need of getting help from both marketing strategists and demand planners. Erroneous forecasts, and incomplete plans may destroy the whole chain. Therefore, cooperation between different disciplines is more important today. A leader should be able to connect people from different disciplines to be able to sustain business. As a result, new generations should be guided to work together instead of working as rivals.
Last but not least, humankind has a social structure that makes it to rule the world. Since our nature is closely related to our social abilities, leading new generations to work together makes them triumphant as it was in our history. Social skills make us differ from other species who live on the planet earth. The ability of forming social structures such as cultures, economies, companies makes humankind to organise actions efficiently. For instance, boosting the production during the first industrial revolution was possible because of capitalist economy, which has a structural dependency on social interactions such as money exchanges, that has started to be developed during that time. In other words, connecting different parties around the world with the help of social skills led humankind to have a byzantine economic structure and huge amount of production capacities. Therefore, leading new generations to create social relations helps them to be more successful and beneficial to the planet.
In conclusion, the idea of having new generations which are competing with each other wouldn’t be helpful for both development and maintain the businesses. Therefore, one should guide new generations to cooperate with each other.
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people 58
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 66
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you 66
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 16
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 455, Rule ID: ADOPT_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adapt to'?
Suggestion: adapt to
...ion should guide its new generations to adopt to work together instead of working as a r...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 500, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a rival' or simply 'rivals'?
Suggestion: a rival; rivals
... to work together instead of working as a rivals. I will explore the reasons in the foll...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 535, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a detailed way" with adverb for "detailed"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...rations to work as an enemy. To explain in a detailed way, if a employee doesn’t provide sufficie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 557, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...enemy. To explain in a detailed way, if a employee doesn’t provide sufficient out...
^
Line 3, column 920, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e able to sustain business. As a result, new generations should be guided to work...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, first of all, in contrast to, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2999.0 2235.4752809 134% => OK
No of words: 564.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31737588652 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87326216964 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86218929036 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478723404255 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 935.1 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1907822347 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7419354839 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1935483871 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.48387096774 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112935491349 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032520507931 0.0831039109588 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397317882904 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.078600675666 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415336447685 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 143.0 100.480337079 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.