The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Waste management has been the major problem for almost all cities of all countries. Especially, the cities of underdeveloped counties which do not have access to scientific waste management facilities are worsened by this problem; it has, thus, lead to unpleasing environment and even has compromised the health of residents. Hence, waste management is of serious concern to all. The prompt mentioned above introduces the concept of enacting limitations in the amount of trash accepted by cities. I moderately agree with the prompt; I will further elaborate my stance through the paragraphs mentioned below.
To begin with, humans tends to be profligate on any matters, especially when there are no restrictions on it. We generally produce a great deal of wastes without taking other considerations. The restrictions would make us think twice when producing wastes. The author of the argument is rational here by suggesting regulations that reduces the amount of wastes produced. The waste produced in Kathmandu city, for instance, was substantially reduced when regulations regarding the amount of waste was imposed by the metropolitan city. The respondents from the city reported that they became cautious in producing wastes after such laws were ratified. The same measures also contributed in more production of biodegradable wastes such as paper bags. This way, these examples and evidences validate the argument mentioned above.
In a similar manner, such restriction measures also bring behavioral changes in the residents of the city. These behavioral do posse measures that helps to combat environmental problems. The residents of Neelakantha municipality, Dhading were found to distinguish biodegradable waste from non-biodegradable waste and eventually they used such biodegradable wastes as manure in the kitchen gardens. It is true that these sorts of changes could help to combat environmental problems even if to a small degree. Hence, it is apparent that restrictive measures could entice behavioral changes in the residents and thereby reducing environmental impacts.
However, the restrictive measures must not be so severe that some section of society could not perform under such regulations; there are some entity in societies that produces a lot of waste owing to the operation they perform. Restaurants, for example, produce a vast amount of waste; such measures would exact a toll in their business. Similar complaints were registered by business entities such as hotels and restaurants from Bharatpur, municipality when restricting measures were put forward. It could be far better if provisions of extra charges for wastes which are surplus to limit are made; the claim, in this way, would be more robust.
To sum up, the claim is rational despite of some concessions; yet proper concern also should be directed towards such constraints. It is, however, imperative that the measures that restricts the waste acceptance should be brought up; this plays a huge role in the scientific management of waste and consequentially promotes better environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-19 | Juhong Park | 10 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
- Some people believe that in order to thrive a society must put its own overall success before the well being of its individual citizens Others believe that the well being of a society can only be measured by the general welfare of all its people 62
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it 50
- True success can be measured primarily in terms of the goals one sets for oneself 66
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household 83
- A recent study of our customers suggests that our company is wasting the money it spends on its patented Endure manufacturing process which ensures that our socks are strong enough to last for two years We have always advertised our use of the Endure proc 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 372, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... reduces the amount of wastes produced. The waste produced in Kathmandu city, for i...
^^^
Line 2, column 535, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e was imposed by the metropolitan city. The respondents from the city reported that...
^^^
Line 2, column 651, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...g wastes after such laws were ratified. The same measures also contributed in more ...
^^^
Line 3, column 2, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a similar manner" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...alidate the argument mentioned above. In a similar manner, such restriction measures also bring b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, regarding, so, thus, for example, for instance, such as, it is true, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2609.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 474.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50421940928 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08882734802 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542194092827 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 823.5 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.5259662341 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.708333333 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20935155071 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583717025469 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440248420579 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11403771274 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370030521863 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.