The best way to solve problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they accept from each household
Environmental conservation is the need of the hour for sustenance of mankind on earth. Recently, the awareness on cleanliness, hygiene and ecological preservation has been widespread that almost there will be none who does not know at least the basics. The writer’s argument that imposing restrictions on waste collection from households is the best way to address the environmental problems has to be disagreed in one way or the other.
It is known to everyone that the lifestyle of people has changed in due course of time so as the waste we generate. The difference between non degradable waste and degradable waste has grown manifold and the overall waste generated per household will be many more times greater than what it was ten years back. So this is the crucial time to encourage and motivate the collection of waste from each and every home.
If done otherwise, the result would not be what is expected by the writer. Rather than improvement in environment scales, it would cause detrimental effects. The amount of waste coming out of each home is not remaining constant or in worst case increasing, whereas implementing a restriction in collecting the waste will push people to the frenzy of dumping their waste wherever they can. Hoping that having a fence on waste collection will reduce the waste generation would be an erroneous assumption as they do not have even a slightest possibility of occurence
Moreover, the scheme of collecting the domestic wastes has not reached each and every corner of the nation. If the writer’s argument is correct, then the environmental indexes in those areas should be high. But it is not so. Those are the areas where people have the poorest environment and surrounding to live. All kinds of wastes got rid of randomly have affected them in the most malign way leading to diseases and many unknown side effects.
The better action that can be done for the improvement of environment would be one where people are motivated to get rid of their garbage only through the collectors and if possible segregating the waste at the consumer level itself. Allocating more budget, hiring more people and erecting more waste treatment plants would be the most suitable path to accomplish what the writer truly wants. Choosing the given method is trying to stop the rain as the city gets flooded.
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think is is a positive or negative development 78
- The pie charts below give information about the household expenditure of an average US family in different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ween non degradable waste and degradable waste has grown manifold and the overall...
^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the worst'.
Suggestion: in the worst
... each home is not remaining constant or in worst case increasing, whereas implementing a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 528, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ous assumption as they do not have even a slightest possibility of occurence M...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, then, whereas, as to, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 394.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97715736041 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76175372178 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53807106599 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.5014080627 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.352941176 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1764705882 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11764705882 5.21951772744 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209938181725 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0592743196357 0.0831039109588 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645373623787 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113751470194 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415227911221 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.