The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The term ‘best’ as used in the recommendation means the most effective way of teaching. For a strategy of passing knowledge and instilling right behavior and morals in an individual(s) to be considered effective, it has to adopt a wholistic approach which seems to be missing in this recommendation. Praising positive behaviors is an effective strategy for teaching as it encourages learning and also fosters the continued practice of such positive behavior or attitude. In addition, praising a positive behavior will instill in the other learners the willingness to practice such behavior. For instance, an approbation of the neatness and punctuality of a student in the presence of the entire school would not only instill a sense of pride and satisfaction in the student but promote the practice of neatness and punctuality among other students.
Furthermore, teaching is incomplete if it does not adopt an all-round approach. Negative actions are important contributors to effective learning depending on how such actions are handled. From the aforementioned example, taking strict measures against late coming or dirty appearance will also instill in students a sense of neatness and punctuality among students. On the other hand, if such negative action is ignored, such students would not be able to learn important values of life such as personal hygiene and punctuality. The recognition of this fact underscores the need for prize giving and award ceremonies in the society to reward good actions such as diligence, hard work, creativity, integrity, humanitarianism etc. and also promote the practice of such behavior. The realization of the role of negative actions in teaching also underscores the practice of judgement and punishment for negative and illegal actions such as theft, bullying, juvenile delinquency to deter others from engaging in such behavior. However, ignoring such negative actions will lead to a continued practice of such action which would be detrimental to the individual practicing such behavior and the community in the long run, defeating the whole essence of teaching and learning process.
In conclusion, praising positive action and taking appropriate measures against negative ones rather than ignoring is the right recipe for effective teaching.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an individual' or simply 'individuals'?
Suggestion: an individual; individuals
...instilling right behavior and morals in an individuals to be considered effective, it has to a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to depend'.
Suggestion: to depend
...tant contributors to effective learning depending on how such actions are handled. From t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1270, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
... whole essence of teaching and learning process. In conclusion, praising positive acti...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he right recipe for effective teaching.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, still, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 33.0505617978 15% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1942.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 353.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50141643059 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07146434425 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464589235127 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4745243155 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.714285714 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2142857143 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 5.21951772744 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164310169905 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0681568819025 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537251449848 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145775374521 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440853382145 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 14.1392134831 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.