The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
When a child touches a hot object, he/she gets scalded. This experience remains in their minds throughout their lives and they stay wary of such objects. This negative incident teaches them a lesson that is indelible. In the same way individuals performing negative actions also need to be reprimanded, to ensure that they mend their ways. I disagree with the statement that the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Studies have shown that if a person is praised for the good work they do, it motivates them to perform even better. But this doesnot mean that he/ she should be pardoned for every wrong action they do. Absolving them of their wrong deeds would make the complacent. If a teacher gives an assignment to her student, she expects them to have it completed properly. Instead of following the teacher's orders, the students may decide to not do their homework, since they know that their teacher would ignore their misdemeanour. At jobs, a project team leader may want to motivate his team members by praising their good work and ignore their torpid attitude, thus making callous towards their job.
When parents prefer to talk about their children's good work and overlook the inappropriate behaviour they exhibit, they refuse their children the opportunity to learn and grow. Children learn from their mistakes. Young children need to be taught about courteous conduct. Parents should explain to their children as to why they should or should not do a particular deed.
Anything is excess is always detrimental. Excessive praise will spoil the child or make an individual complacent. While nitpicking of every little error will lead to resentment and feeling of ill-will in an individual. So while teaching academics or proper conduct, an individual should be praise for the good things they do, while they should also be educated about the repercussions of their wrong actions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 370, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir ways. I disagree with the statement that the best way to teach is to praise ...
^^
Line 9, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uld or should not do a particular deed. Anything is excess is always detrimental...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e repercussions of their wrong actions.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, thus, while, as to, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1629.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 319.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1065830721 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57287911889 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561128526646 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8835365803 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7368421053 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7894736842 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42105263158 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0925144683099 0.243740707755 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0403369429796 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904860545744 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0685603432123 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694727115499 0.0667264976115 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.