The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The author of the issue highlights that in order to teach effectively it is better to take positive actions into consideration instead of negative actions. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general agreement on this issue. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that if we want a flourishing society, we should take both positive and negative actions into account not only in education but also in the different realm. In the following paragraphs, some convincing reasons will be delineated to elaborate my personal stance.
To commence with, by and large, it is established beyond doubt that teaching plays a dominant role in every given society. Indeed, teaching style could have various merits and drawbacks, especially for students. For this reason, the way of teaching is of utmost critical importance. Broadly speaking, whole societies put their effort to encourage individuals to continue their education and reach a higher education but pay attention just to positive potential might not make students knowledgeable and experienced owing to the fact that the first goal of teaching is to make people skilled. For instance, based on a study conducted in our country vast majorities of students who just relied on their positive abilities and ignored negative ones have not been able to become successful and make a progress even in their career and personal life. To elucidate more on this issue, praise positive actions not only will make students illiterate but also will have deleterious effects on their education.
On the other hand, if educators galvanize individuals to look for their weaknesses and negative actions, they will learn how to take the responsibility for their acts. Generally phrased, crowds of students make the various mistake or even are not able to make a sound decision in their personal lives and do something wrongs due to the fact that they are not mature enough. As a matter of fact, when people especially students pay attention to their negative actions, they will learn that how to be responsible for their works and compensate their faults. Delve further into the issue, although pay attention to positive actions rises up students' incentive and motivation, considering negative acts and weaknesses indeed, make people self-sufficient and reliable.
However, what I alluded to above can't be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with the innumerable benefits, it has, indisputably, pay attention to positive potential will make students confident and patronize them to enhance their self-esteem. As far as I am concerned, myriads of students suffer from the paucity of self-confidence and are not able to progress day in day out. But praise positive actions will provide an opportunity for students to enhance not only their education but also their self-esteem and confident.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that positive and negative actions both make a student's knowledgeable and experienced in his/her personal life. In fact, praise both negative and positive potential and take them into consideration will guarantee students' success and progress. In addition, take negative actions into account will make people take the responsibility of their acts indirectly.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The food we eat today is much healthier than in the past. 90
- TPO 45 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers had a greater influence on young people in the past than they do today 78
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the m 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Technology has made the world a better place to live. 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 639, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... attention to positive actions rises up students incentive and motivation, considering n...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e. However, what I alluded to above cant be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alo...
^^^^
Line 9, column 90, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
...positive and negative actions both make a students knowledgeable and experienced in his/he...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 289, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...uarantee students success and progress. In addition, take negative actions into ac...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, broadly speaking, for instance, in addition, in fact, as a matter of fact, by and large, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2767.0 2235.4752809 124% => OK
No of words: 518.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3416988417 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96966483448 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46138996139 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 885.6 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9380386838 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.761904762 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90476190476 5.21951772744 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173222850077 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667738168765 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447271004061 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119282420375 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371987871009 0.0667264976115 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.