Teaching techniques varies depending on the kids learning stage. While praising positive actions help the kids gain self-confidence, ignoring the negative actions is not always the best way to teach.
Explaining the consequences of the action to the kid yield to deeper understanding. Kids tend to ask questions, and seek answers. Feeding the kids hungry appetite to explore by providing them with beneficial explanation is the best way to teach them. For instant, explaining the role of smoking on detrioting human health for a teanager might presuad him from smoking. while ignoring negative actions will have pernicious results.
Students seeks their parents or teacher reaction for their actions. Unnecessary praising for all positive action will have a negative result. If this praising stop for any reason, the kids will lose the motivation to do these actions. Also, best way of teaching should take into consideration each kid different personality. While some kids seeks attention by positive actions, others seek attention by negative actions. Ignoring negative actions will revoke their negative attitude.
In my opinion it is hard to define teaching best practices in general way. Each teaching experience is unique depending on the environment, the student personality and his perception.
- Scientific theories which people most consider as facts almost prove to be inaccurate thus one should look upon any information describe as factual with skeptism since it may well be proven false in future. 33
- Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. 75
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 58
- A recently issued twenty-year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates. Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. 55
- Some people believe that in order to be effective political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently c 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to stage'
Suggestion: to stage
...s varies depending on the kids learning stage. While praising positive actions help t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...eanager might presuad him from smoking. while ignoring negative actions will have per...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eanager might presuad him from smoking. while ignoring negative actions will have per...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the best'.
Suggestion: , the best
...the motivation to do these actions. Also, best way of teaching should take into consid...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...student personality and his perception.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in general, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 19.5258426966 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 11.3162921348 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 58.6224719101 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1115.0 2235.4752809 50% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 200.0 442.535393258 45% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.575 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 4.55969084622 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88963232955 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 215.323595506 55% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 704.065955056 48% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.6002710012 60.3974514979 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.3333333333 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.3333333333 23.4991977007 57% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.06666666667 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236909689159 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847560931488 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608190103911 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149037745093 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047706180355 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 48.8420337079 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.49 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.