The best way to teach—whether as an educator, employer, or parent—is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
A teacher is one who helps one understand the difference between what is right and what is wrong. To make this differentiation clear it has to be told that some things are acceptable while others are not. While it is very common
Reprimanding an individual for a wrong action creates a feeling of fear that deters or makes them from making the same mistake again. It is followed in society as a corrective measure since ages. The law of land makes it very clear that anyone who tries to cheat or harm other would be punished. An employee is pulled up if it is found that they are involved in unethical behavior.
On the other hand, if we keep ignoring the negative actions then the individuals would never realized what they are doing is wrong. Consider a child which is not checked by the parents when he steals a pen from a classmate. Few years later he would steal something bigger and by the time he grows up he would have developed no sense of understanding that theft is wrong. Therefore it is necessary to check and bring it to notice whenever something is done wrong.
To sum, I do agree that in order to teach it is essential that positive actions be praised but the negative actions must also be criticized and brought to notice. It is the balance that is required to
- "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in a 58
- The best way to teach—whether as an educator, employer, or parent—is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for 41
- highly concerned with leading healthy lives. We should therefore build one of our new stores in Plainsville, which clearly has many such residents. Plainsville merchants report that sales of running shoes and exercise equipment are at all-time highs. The 50
- In order to help small businesses thrive, government should play a minimal role in private business matters. 41
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, at 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...gs are acceptable while others are not. While it is very common Reprimanding an ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 372, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e of understanding that theft is wrong. Therefore it is necessary to check and bring it t...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'while', 'as to', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.14979757085 0.240241500013 62% => OK
Verbs: 0.259109311741 0.157235817809 165% => OK
Adjectives: 0.085020242915 0.0880659088768 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0404858299595 0.0497285424764 81% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0728744939271 0.0444667217837 164% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.109311740891 0.12292977631 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0769230769231 0.0406280797675 189% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.54353933986 2.79330140395 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0364372469636 0.030933414821 118% => OK
Particles: 0.00404858299595 0.0016655270985 243% => OK
Determiners: 0.0931174089069 0.0997080785238 93% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0202429149798 0.0249443105267 81% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0364372469636 0.0148568991511 245% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1289.0 2732.02544248 47% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 234.0 452.878318584 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50854700855 6.0361032391 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.58838876751 85% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.269230769231 0.366273622748 74% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.200854700855 0.280924506359 71% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.132478632479 0.200843997647 66% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0854700854701 0.132149295362 65% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54353933986 2.79330140395 91% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 219.290929204 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598290598291 0.48968727796 122% => OK
Word variations: 60.6228340147 55.4138127331 109% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6194690265 58% => OK
Sentence length: 19.5 23.380412469 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5509537799 59.4972553346 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.416666667 141.124799967 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 23.380412469 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.674092028746 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 39.5854700855 51.4728631049 77% => OK
Elegance: 0.902173913043 1.64882698954 55% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307359754178 0.391690518653 78% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.106974348472 0.123202303941 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0870674646795 0.077325440228 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.543464269518 0.547984918172 99% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.132584933971 0.149214159877 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132061325251 0.161403998019 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632580802686 0.0892212321368 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.284462424927 0.385218514788 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0214918815959 0.0692045440612 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211568339634 0.275328986314 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624271840953 0.0653680567796 96% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 10.4325221239 10% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.30420353982 170% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 7.22455752212 14% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.66592920354 191% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 13.5995575221 66% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.