Claim: An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action. Reason: When assessing the morality of an action, the results of the action are more important than the intent of the person or people performing the action. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim AND the reason on which that claim is based.
The issue leads to the link between the greater good and its intent. The final outcome is the only matter in the present world. Monitoring the intent can be done for the sake of self satisfaction but explicitly the result is the matter.
Firstly, an action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action because nothing in the world is perfect. Every occurrence either has more good and less bad or more bad and less good. In a human's perspective the greater benefit is considered as perfect and the intent of the action performed is not important . The government's plan on infrastructure and other developmental actions would overall support the country. However, some categories like farmers, environment, etc. would greatly get affected.
Secondly , the intent of the action is not important. Here initial deployment of the task may be caustic but the final outcome may have resulted in good accidently. To illustrate this, let us take the example of government's plan for economic development. First the government would increase the tax and use that for developmental plans. The intent here is good but resulting was bad for initial period. The succeeding benefit will be greater. Another example, an emergency brake applied by the driver to prevent the accident. However people consider him/her as a rash driver which .
Finally, the greater bad also give out some good results. The conjectivie eyes give clean eyes after its cure. Likewise, greater good also consists of bad. For example, the medicines are obtained from the rare tree species. This may lead to extinction of the species but still provides medicine for some virulent diseases.
To conclude, the perfection in this world is imaginary. The greater good may cause some disadvantages. If the limitations more vulnerable then advance planning can help to get rid of it. And the intent may be bad but the resulting good won't let us us to turn towards it. Adaptive measures for the vulnerable is another way to attain the state of almost perfection.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-04 | Aishwarya01 | 54 | view |
| 2023-07-13 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2022-09-12 | Sumilak | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | headboy | 50 | view |
| 2022-06-07 | Jaichiddharth R K | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ess bad or more bad and less good. In a humans perspective the greater benefit is cons...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...of the action performed is not important . The governments plan on infrastructure ...
^^
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...would greatly get affected. Secondly , the intent of the action is not importa...
^^
Line 5, column 527, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... by the driver to prevent the accident. However people consider him/her as a rash drive...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 581, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... consider him/her as a rash driver which . Finally, the greater bad also give ...
^^
Line 9, column 104, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ater good may cause some disadvantages. If the limitations more vulnerable then ad...
^^
Line 9, column 139, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...ges. If the limitations more vulnerable then advance planning can help to get rid of...
^^^^
Line 9, column 144, Rule ID: ADVANCE_PLANNING[1]
Message: This phrase might be redundant. Use simply 'planning'.
Suggestion: planning
...If the limitations more vulnerable then advance planning can help to get rid of it. And the inte...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 246, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: us
... be bad but the resulting good wont let us us to turn towards it. Adaptive measures f...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, likewise, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 351.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0113960114 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71058850635 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532763532764 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8058260408 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 65.1481481481 118.986275619 55% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.0 23.4991977007 55% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.07407407407 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340523228119 0.243740707755 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762255275439 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141831777201 0.0758088955206 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178605741352 0.150359130593 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.188273656325 0.0667264976115 282% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.89 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.