Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The claim presented here is that any field should replace leaders every five years. The reasoning behind this is that new leadership revitalizes an industry and guarantees success. This is not always true and there are many other reasons to replace and keep leadership in an enterprise.
To begin, replacing leadership every five years can be disruptive to a field. For example, if a profitable business replaces their CEO, because they have been there for five years, this could endanger the success this business is experiencing. When an enterprise is working efficiently this is no reason to risk messing this up by changing the leadership. In other fields, such as education, changing principals after five years could ruin the way a school is working. Students who have grown accustomed to a certain system could be disrupted by a change, this might affect grades.
Moreover, leaders who have been in power a long time have more experience and expertise. When working in a field for a while those in charge begin to recognize what works and what does not work. Through trial and error, they come up with a system that is most efficient. When leaders are replaced every five years this interrupts their growth and stop leaders from every finding the right method. For example, in education a teacher may recognize that the best way their students learn is through answering questions. A new teacher may try a different method and teach the students less efficiently.
In opposition to this some may argue that changing leadership brings new ideas. This is true but replacing leadership every five years based on this logic is extreme. The benefits of a fresh take on an industry are not equal to the stress new leadership places on a field. New leadership also means the loss of experience and knowledge that the old powers had. The negative consequences of losing the original leadership unweight the positives from fresh leadership.
In conclusion, the claim that those in power should be replaced every year based on the reasoning that new leadership brings success is extreme. While new leadership can be a good idea when needed by a struggling industry, old leadership that is doing a good job should not be replaced. Replacing old leadership when it is not needed does more harm than good.
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette."On Balmer Island, where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation, the population increases to 100,000 during the summer months. To reduce the number of accidents i 63
- Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts.Write a response in which you 50
- Arctic deer live on islands in Canada's arctic regions. They search for food by moving over ice from island to island during the course of the year. Their habitat is limited to areas warm enough to sustain the plants on which they feed and cold enough, a 77
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 245, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... success this business is experiencing. When an enterprise is working efficiently th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1919.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 387.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95865633075 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66775812449 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472868217054 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.008607272 60.3974514979 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.2272727273 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5909090909 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231557864429 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759848703717 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583445961616 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145145590439 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521369622543 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.