Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new
leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The claim, that regardless of any field – business, politics, education, government - those in power should abdicate after five years, is specious. Also it is so far to say that reorganizing any organization through new leadership assures success and rejuvenation. Indeed there are some fields where introduction of new leadership may encourage innovation, but we can’t say it is applicable universally to every field. One of the key components of success to any enterprise will be to have a balanced approach in organizing the leadership between the new and the veteran leaders.
To begin with, experience is one of the key factor in leadership in any filed be it business, politics, education or government. A new and young leader may introduce dynamism to the filed, but he or she will definitely have little exposure to many of the critical aspects of running the show smoothly. For instance, energy business is evolving and is not limited to traditional type like petroleum products, natural gas etc. A newcomer leader to the energy business may focus primarily on alternate sources as alternate energy is the current trend in market. But in order to run a successful energy business one must have the proper exposure to both the renewable energy and traditionally used energy. So a balanced approach and mind set is required to handle the energy business today. Therefore, an enterprise focused on energy business need to select the leadership with both experienced and young representatives.
Admittedly, if we look into world politics, we can see that there are instances of countries where the number of tenures a premier gets is limited to maximum one or two. This is indeed for giving chance to the young and vibrant leaders. For example, in USA a person can be elected as a president for maximum two times. However, it may not be suitable to assert that new and young leaders will do better than the old ones. Leadership of a nation has to have a holistic understanding of the nation & the people. But with lack of experience, these understandings will not be suitable for running a nation properly.
However, it is a common trend globally among enterprises to focus on recruiting the young generation. It is a belief that young minds nurture brilliant ideas and they are far more innovative. But in selecting leadership, we have not seen a universal trend of giving chance to the new leaders only in the companies worldwide. If we look into the CEOs of the top companies like Google, Microsoft, Apple; one thing common among them is that they have spent enough time in the organizations before getting promoted to leaders.
In sum, the leadership selection in any field should have a balanced approach between selecting the young inexperienced and experienced ones. The reason provided in the reading that young leadership ensures success of an organization is dubious and does not have any basis.
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor of National Issues magazine in the countryof Ganadia.Last month, National Issues ran an article about the decline—as measured by shrinking populations and the flight of young people—of small towns in Ga 63
- "In any academic area or professional field, it is just as important to recognize the limits of ourknowledge and understanding as it is to acquire new facts and information." 66
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved andgenerated.Write a response in which you discuss t 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through newleadership.Write a response in which you discuss the 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...abdicate after five years, is specious. Also it is so far to say that reorganizing a...
^^^^
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Indeed,
...rship assures success and rejuvenation. Indeed there are some fields where introductio...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2454.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 485.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05979381443 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94712771566 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478350515464 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 795.6 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6675411068 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.695652174 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0869565217 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21739130435 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166320888625 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545082009123 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0958779247773 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10501631353 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101125263685 0.0667264976115 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.