Claim: In any field -business, politics, education government – those in power should step down after 5 years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
The statement contends that in every field, the people in authority should abdicate their power after 5 years as new leadership can surely bring success for any organization. I partially agree with the argument, the author has provided due to following reasonings.
First, the change in leadership after 5 years term can bring new fresh ideas and perspective pertaining to that generation as world is constantly changing. For example, in India, the oldest political party, Congress, brought a new face and leader for the elections so that they can bring new angle into their expression and relate to the problems that are faced by majority of the decade. This strategy proved to be beneficiary for them.
In this fast paced world, change is the only constant. Therefore, it is crucial to keep up with the pace of the technology. The change in leadership can help to innovate and grow as the world needs. It can provide new direction for the enterprise. Therefore, anyone who can adapt to the fast paced change and adapt accordingly can surely bring prosperity as a leader.
A leader should be able to encourage the people working with him to give their best and deliver the best possible work. A leader should be able to guide him/his subordinates and be an exemplar for them. Hence, it is essential to measure how much effectiveness, change and potential, a leader can bring out of a person.
The other reason is the with power humans tend to become arrogant and greedy. For this reason, I think the change in leadership periodically is a necessity. For example, if one person is in power of a authorized position for a very long time, he/she might take that responsibility for granted and think of themselves as inevitable. Hence, for reality check, and stay grounded one must step down from the position of responsibility for a while. However, if a person is working hard for the success of the organization without getting attached to the power, he/she should continue the position as deserving candidate. This also encourages other people to take responsibility and be leader at their own level. Sundar Pichai, the CEO of Google is a perfect example for this. He earned this position with his hard work and now, he is role model for many people in the world.
The change in leadership can surely bring prosperity and success to an organization in any field as it opens the new path to innovation and perspectives. However, the efforts of the existing leader should not be discouraged. The deserving leader is indistinguishable and will surely lead the way.
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field 50
- Government should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear 75
- Of the two leading real estate firms in our town Adams Realty and Fitch Realty Adams is clearly superior Adams has 40 real estate agents In contrast Fitch has 25 many of whom work only part time Moreover Adams revenue last year was twice as high as that o 80
- Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society especially among children Others believe that children s peer groups and parental role models are a much more influence on children s behavior 75
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after 5 years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 200, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...r example, if one person is in power of a authorized position for a very long tim...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2143.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 436.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91513761468 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84500852736 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477064220183 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 674.1 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 14.0 4.99550561798 280% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2043246312 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2916666667 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1666666667 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217244326754 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636661508851 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718204933497 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12361472482 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0698803746355 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.