Have you ever considered asking a great football player to resign just because he has completed his 5 years playing in the team? So is with the politics, education, business and government. One cannot be asked to abdicate from the power only on the basis of their tenure. Doing so will restrain great people from giving their best. However, there are many other ways to ensure that no one grows too fond of their powers and starts misusing them.
To begin with, we cannot restrain someone from getting into their position back if everyone wishes otherwise. That is why the existing systems of election are there, they are meticulously designed to make sure that only the best gets to serve the public and that too for a limited period only. After that tenure, each will have to gain the trust of populace again to reinstate to their positions, after winning the elections. If they win, no one can prevent them from going back to their positions. This ensures that the top performers get all the chance they deserve. Take for an example, in United States every president has to re-run the elections after 4 years to get elected again.
Additionally, these systems ensure that people who are disinterested in their duties and ignore their responsibilities get to see the exit on time. There are several positions where such election procedure is not available, due to which people suffer from bad administration. Implementation of election process at these positions should be encouraged to make sure the consistent availability of good administration. For example, the government employees that work at definitive positions in India don't have to worry regarding job security and thus grow corrupt. Only if there was some way that these people employed at administrative levels could be assessed for their performance and honesty, the menace of corruption could be controlled.
On the other hand, if we ask every administrator to abdicate from their position and give way to others on completion of their tenure, there would be no guarantee of justified devotion from the next person in line. Some policies demand more than 5 years to come into effect completely, such policies will always be under threat of getting ruled out by frequently changing rulers. Not to mention schemes, funds and other plans that are designed to function for a long time and promise benefit for everyone, can meet the same fate as their implementer.
Conclusively, the idea that business, politics, government and education should strive to make sure people at powerful positions do not stay there long enough to get adulterated by sense of power. But they should also ensure that the ruling positions should not get ephemeral to the extent that their existence becomes indifferent to everyone.
- It is better to ask your own knowledge and experience to solve problems than to ask other people for advice. 73
- Claim Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Reason We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both Write a response in which you discuss the extent to 64
- Each year, the crime rate increases. What are the causes and what could be done to prevent this rise in criminal activity?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 67
- Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reas 83
- News stories on TV and in newspaper are very often accompanied by pictures.Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.What is your opinion about this? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 499, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...t work at definitive positions in India dont have to worry regarding job security an...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, regarding, so, thus, as to, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2326.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 460.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05652173913 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73776363414 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552173913043 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.841292829 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.761904762 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9047619048 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61904761905 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0783608303736 0.243740707755 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0276147221114 0.0831039109588 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337204545568 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0538239597712 0.150359130593 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366470448209 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.