Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Even the best food loses its taste when it goes stale. To expect a human mind to generate a ceaseless pool of ideas seems ridiculous at best. So revitalization of manpower is the surest way to increase productivity and guarantee a steady supply of new ideas in any field, be it business, politics, education or even running the government. Moreover power corrupts even the most altruistic of saints. We humans struggle against the magnetic pull of power everyday. To bestow upon one person a lot of power for a long period of time is like supplying cocaine to a drug addict. It just doesn't bode well in the long run. Also people in power sometimes let grudges or feelings of bias for their employees influence their treatment of them. Feelings of nepotism and corruption also tend to take roots in such a scenario. Sometimes an infinitesimal error in judgment leads to an unworthy person being promoted to a position of power and while such an error cannot always be remedied, a periodic recycle of leadership can dilute the negative consequence of such an error. People given a certain period of time or deadlines tend to set more realistic goals and execute them than people who have been given an indefinite period of time. This suggests that leaderships that come with an expiration date will be more productive than those that aren't because wouldn't you rather be legend who is remembered by all and looked up to by his successor than the guy whose mess has to be cleaned by his successor or even the guy who simply didn't do anything worth a mention? But to be fair, the periodic change in leadership comes with its fair share of cons. People tend to trust those that they know the longest as a general rule. And leaders who have been in that position for a longer period have had enough time to build a strong foundation with their employees, based on trust, understanding and familiarity. Also they command a certain level of loyalty that a newbie might not. Implementation of certain policies or ideas also take a longer time and while a successor can implement the ideas of its predecessor, this is rarely the case. But perusing both sides of the argument, I do think the pros of revitalization through new leadership outweigh the cons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ol of ideas seems ridiculous at best. So revitalization of manpower is the surest...
^^
Line 1, column 342, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ucation or even running the government. Moreover power corrupts even the most altruistic...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 456, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ggle against the magnetic pull of power everyday. To bestow upon one person a lot of pow...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 518, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...on one person a lot of power for a long period of time is like supplying cocaine to a drug add...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 585, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...lying cocaine to a drug addict. It just doesnt bode well in the long run. Also people ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 619, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... just doesnt bode well in the long run. Also people in power sometimes let grudges o...
^^^^
Line 1, column 1072, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive consequence of such an error. People given a certain period of time or deadli...
^^
Line 1, column 1090, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... such an error. People given a certain period of time or deadlines tend to set more realistic...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1214, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...eople who have been given an indefinite period of time. This suggests that leaderships that co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1335, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...will be more productive than those that arent because wouldnt you rather be legend wh...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 1349, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...roductive than those that arent because wouldnt you rather be legend who is remembered ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1523, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...is successor or even the guy who simply didnt do anything worth a mention? But to be ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 1898, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...n trust, understanding and familiarity. Also they command a certain level of loyalty...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, moreover, so, well, while, as for, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71246819338 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69034126965 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554707379135 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.0797243215 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 13.0 7.80617977528 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105895688596 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.032008837151 0.0831039109588 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442945650653 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105895688596 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.