The idea of having five year term for individuals in power in the field of business, politics, education, government is an interesting topic to discuss. Making it compulsion has both advantage as well as disadvantage like every other topic. So I would to say that yes, it is necessary in the field of politics, government, to some extent in education. But, it wouldn't be ideal in the field of business.
The reason why I agree with the authors view is that having a five year term will have the politicians, government officials to be in check, this will avoid corruption. If they were to rule for infinite period of duration they would take things lightly for instance, Kim Jong Un of North Korea who came into power because of his father and grand father is an unworthy dictator. He has no regard for his people and controls the nation through fear. This can be avoided if he had a term for his regime not just the unworthy will be removed there will opportunity for fresh mind and idea. Nepotism which is a very bad form of government can be devastating if the heir is worthless for example, the Nehru family which is ruling for decades is now in the abysmal state as Rahul Gandhi who is not so smart. He cannot be replaced as the leader of the party because of his ancestry.
Likewise there many use of having to lookover without a teneur especially in the field of business consider Jeff Bezo he worked on his company for more than two decades now in order to become the richest man and to make Amazon a billion dollar company. Had he been replaced there would not an Amazon now, some people are passionate and talented they are the secret ingredient for success if you have them removed the food would to bad. Every person has his or her unique method of managing and handling problem if their idea works then it is better to let them stay in top, ultimately progress and success is all that matters. Having a tenure won't provide opportunity for people who are hard working to stay in top.
Another defect with the idea is that 5 years is a very short duration of time if you had replaced Jeff in the sixth year God knows very Amazon would be now. And i believe if you are worth and have talent within you will reach your potential height.
Concluding I have to say that as much as it is needed to have time duration for those in power it needs to be restricted to certain areas and not emphasised completely. With all the above points I hope it clear that you cannot agree on to one idea.
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 75
- Claim Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Reason Many people s dreams are inherently selfish Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which 71
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 50
- Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership 83
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you t 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'term' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'terms'.
Suggestion: terms
The idea of having five year term for individuals in power in the field o...
^^^^
Line 1, column 194, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...Making it compulsion has both advantage as well as disadvantage like every other topic. So...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...t, to some extent in education. But, it wouldnt be ideal in the field of business. The...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the politicians, government officials to be in check, this will avoid corruption....
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
... of the party because of his ancestry. Likewise there many use of having to lookover wi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun use seems to be countable; consider using: 'many uses'.
Suggestion: many uses
...ecause of his ancestry. Likewise there many use of having to lookover without a teneur ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 161, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...God knows very Amazon would be now. And i believe if you are worth and have talen...
^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'clears'?
Suggestion: clears
...ly. With all the above points I hope it clear that you cannot agree on to one idea.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, look, so, then, well, for example, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 461.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42299349241 5.05705443957 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39175433495 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503253796095 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2492115424 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.277777778 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6111111111 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133855128691 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482101063066 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528106339396 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0791062341002 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664049147761 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 48.8420337079 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 12.1639044944 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.