Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership
The statement above asserts that leaders in any field should be substituted by setting a limited period. The statement further reasons that such a substitution is necessary as the revitalization is the surest way to bring success for any enterprise.
To begin with, in politics, it is necessary for a leader to be changed after a period. Regardless of the aptitude of the leaders, there are political parties need to have the opportunity to hold the power. Otherwise the government might be at risk of the political intrigues from those parties. The finish line should be set for the political power-holders, otherwise it would be sought surreptitiously. Furthermore, the political system would develop its weaknesses intrinsically. The feeling of belonging to an office cannot be dismissed readily after passing most of the four or eight years in that post. The president is prone to adopt the dictatorial attitude. Saddam Hussein was the president of Iraq for near 24 years. He did not cede the power unless the military of United States of America got involved and many lost their lives.
We concede to the time limitation because of the avoiding potential pitfalls in politics. Nevertheless, in the context of business or education, it would not be prudent to do so. In such fields, when a system is working properly, as the statement’s reason failed to consider, there is no need of revitalization. Every change might exact a high price on the system. Sometimes holding the leaders in power stand in a good stead for the systems. Even when the substitute is equally deserving, In order for a new leadership to settle down in a system, there is a significant amount of dead time. Where a substitution takes place, all connections should be reestablished, priorities change and the manager should align others with the new strategies. This calls its own dead time, which might hold back the business from its rivals.
Finally, revitalization and holding the incumbent leader in power, is not mutually exclusive. The leaders can be open minded enough to align themselves with the new practical ideas during their management. It is not necessary to replace a manager to revitalize an enterprise. Consider Steve Jobs of the heads of Apple Incorporation. As a manager, he was always flexible to new ideas, and he was tolerable to make shifts. Revitalization occurred during his management with every patent the Apple Incorporation made for its product.
In short, as it is discussed, aside the politics, it does not pay to set a time limit for leaders. Furthermore, revitalization is not always justified when the system is operating optimally. Finally, even the revitalization is needed, it can be attained without necessarily replacing the leaders of an enterprise.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-09-21 | akshaymanjunath | 83 | view |
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed. 80
- The following appeared in an editorial in a business magazine Although the sales of Whirlwind video games have declined over the past two years a recent survey of video game players suggests that this sales trend is about to be reversed The survey asked v 86
- To be an effective leader, a public official must maintain the highest ethical and moral standards. 80
- Claim: Major policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts.Reason: Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better judgment and perspective than do members of the general public. 40
- A recent study reported that pet owners have longer healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets Specifically dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease In light of these findings Sherwood Hospital should form a partnership wi 53
Comments
Hi , please let me now the
Hi , please let me now the flaws that I've got 4.5 on this issue. My guess is the last paragraph.
Yes, it is the last
Yes, it is the last paragraph. It is like a report.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 28 15
No. of Words: 454 350
No. of Characters: 2256 1500
No. of Different Words: 233 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.616 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.969 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.978 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 164 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 124 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 86 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 68 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.214 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.708 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.25 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.243 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.437 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.064 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5