It is information which makes us wise. All the countries which are nowadays considered wealthy, have a variety collection of information, technology and so on. As the statement states that any information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted as the can be proven false in the future but, i partially disagree with this statement for the following reasons.
First of all, in modern science information is everything. In the scientific research scientist sometimes search for something and in the process, they find other things as the process which is true for scientific purposes. In the proccess, they gather a huge of information or data which is not always useful at that time. But, in future, with that data, scientist find new findings. If the data assumed as false and threw away, it will be never possible to find anything with that data in the future. For instance, Gallelio Said in his time that the earth moving around the sun and at that time everyone opposed to him including the Christian society. Later on, now it is proven that he was right. Another example, Einstein invented calculus, which found at his time little to use, but, now we use calculus in our most scientific research. What if, Einstein found it no useful and never collects it!
But sometimes people spread information to manipulate us. Such as media or social media propaganda. In 2018 on Bangladesh, a group of people spread propaganda of murder, rape, mass killing to mislead a peaceful protest for road safety. At this contest, it is very harmful to believe in those information which is not true.
In conclusion, people should inquiry any information before believing in it. In scientific purposes as well as, in other purposes such as government it will be fine to believe any information after inquiry, otherwise, it will be unwise to trust and misled information.
- the extended family is less important than it was in the past. 60
- Reading:Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725−1798) wrote a long memoir recounting hislife and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famouspeople, including kings and writers, his memo 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Your school has enough money to purchase either computers for students or books for the library. Which should your school choose to buy —computers or books? Use specific reasons and examples to support your recommendation. 60
- As early as the twelfth century A.D., the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their "great houses," massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high. Archaeo 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 329, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...is not always useful at that time. But, in future, with that data, scientist find new fin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 516, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h that data in the future. For instance, Gallelio Said in his time that the earth...
^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'those informations'?
Suggestion: this information; those informations
...ntest, it is very harmful to believe in those information which is not true. In conclusion, peop...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 314.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93630573248 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76436790019 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563694267516 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.9502867046 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1764705882 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254106577074 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769782831414 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734057335159 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168067116888 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759556355153 0.0667264976115 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.