A statement provide a view regarding truthfulness of any information which are supposed to be as facts. However, the statement is not so cogent as it is based on a wrong foundation of information. An anticipation of the fact will be proven false or it may turn out to be inaccurate in a future does not convince that an information should be mistrusted.
Facts are derived from a diligent and meticulous study over particular subject. Fact are advocated by the various evidences that the researcher finds during his/her research which are later monitored and evaluated by various experts of the scientific community. Fact is not a fact until it is proven right contemporarily. However, they may come up with modification and subject to improvement in them with some flaws in them, they are to be considered truthful and pragmatic. We can give a example the various facts we know today about various sectors like biology, chemistry, geology, space science etc. All the facts are supported by substantial and tenable explanation. Various theories and facts were introduced about the origin of earth like Nebular Theory, Big Bang theory. Previously derived Nebular theory was proven wrong by the Big Bang theory but also the Big Bang theory may be proven wrong in the future, but it is the best we have now. It explains the concept of the evolution of the earth in a more justified way and also with proper scientific evidences than the Nebular theory.
Moreover, if every facts and theories are considered to be false and inaccurate, there will be no more innovation and discoveries in the world. All discoveries are based on certain principles and facts like a telecommunication is highly dependent on the facts and theories of frequencies and wavelength of electromagnetic waves. We are surrounded by the world in which we are surrounded by products of the discoveries based on facts and theories. Facts are, for sure, subject to significant change by more researches and advance technology. Though they may be proven inaccurate in future, they are proven at present and apply practically at present as well. These facts are to be followed until new facts with more scientific evidences emerge.
However, it not not always obvious that all facts are accurate. Apart from scientific theories, many advertisements manipulate or even create a fact for their self interest and profit. These type of facts are very common when a people have a strong belief in an orthodox. It is found that a superstitious and traditional beliefs always bring inaccurate and misleading facts.
In conclusion, although the facts may be proven wrong in future, we have to trust it. Facts are scientifically proven informations which can be trusted till new facts come up with more satisfying evidences.
- "Success in any realm of life comes more often from taking chances or risks than from careful and cautious planning 50
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Quiot Manufacturing."During the past year, Quiot Manufacturing had 30 percent more on-the-job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries plant, where the work shifts are one hour shorter 83
- “Leaders should focus more on the needs of the majority than on the needs of the minority.”Discuss whether you agree or disagree with the statement. Use relevant reasons and examples to support your point of view. In developing and supporting your pos 50
- A recent survey of 250 adults between the ages of 30 and 45 showed an association between the number of hours adults spend online each day and the self-reporting of symptoms commonly associated with depression. The survey found that adults who spend 30 ho 16
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future. Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A statement' or simply 'statements'?
Suggestion: A statement; Statements
A statements provides a view regarding truthfulness ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'provide'.
Suggestion: provide
A statements provides a view regarding truthfulness of any in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 488, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...red truthful and pragmatic. We can give a example the various facts we know today...
^
Line 3, column 578, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...y. Though they may be proven inaccurate in future, they are proven at present and apply p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 13, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: not
...ientific evidences emerge. However, it not not always obvious that all facts are accur...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 55, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... although the facts may be proven wrong in future, we have to trust it. Facts are scienti...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, well, apart from, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 37.0 19.5258426966 189% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2333.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 460.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07173913043 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00158354552 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465217391304 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 744.3 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6189078612 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.2083333333 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.54166666667 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313430956473 0.243740707755 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917706738169 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103065386377 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209607844404 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119376906078 0.0667264976115 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.