Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.
Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does one really discover the value of that idea.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Yes, Obviously. If you want to convince somebody over an argument then you have to share your perspective of the whole situation. But it should be solid. and, by solid, I mean, it should be something which supports by a strong statement which will clear your doubts. All the theories, you have seen or learned in the science or more like in Astrophysics, are totally based on the physical observations explained by the scientists. For Example, That the earth is round, this theory not just negotiated or being debated by a scientist, they did prove it with the help of the satellite's camera by bleak all the information around the globe and show it to the world by holding a press conference. Ans, also the theories stated given by scientists like Gravitational force explained by Albert Einstein during 1900s because there was no physical proof or they don't have any instruments to validate the einstein hypothesis that's why Einstein had to support his theory with some practical mathematical equation. So, what I mean to say that you always need strong solid support to defend your hypothesis or your perspective.
Actually, This is what happens in our society these days, Everyone is getting brainwash by the powerful peoples, and by powerful, I meant the people who control our world or our media. Yes, our Media. Most politicians have bought most of the channels of their respective country to just show what they wanted to show. And, the country which has a poor literacy rate compared to their population has been brainwashed due to the lack of intelligence or common sense. That is also, the reason for the poor leadership selection during elections. Because they only show people what they want to see and make them believe that they are the right choice, and due to the lack of analytical skills, most people cast their vote to the wrong government.
The brainwashing starts from the mid-1950s when the influence of television was so strong. After observing the influence of television over the population, Most of the companies start using it for the advertisements and purpose, after some time, it starts using by the elections and campaign or stuff. The impact of the news channel is so big over our life. Because we always seek the truth from in their words. But nowadays, everything has changed, now they use these channels to publicise their good acts and build the fake image into the mind of illiterate people. Also, confuse the literate part too.
in conclusion, I want to say that every argument needs to be defended by both viewpoints of yours and your opposition too. There should be a healthy debate
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Abhipray Singh | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Abhipray Singh | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Pranjil | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | NRS | 58 | view |
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy. 16
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems. 54
- the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 64
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Yes, Obviously. If you want to convince somebody over an a...
^^
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...hole situation. But it should be solid. and, by solid, I mean, it should be somethi...
^^^
Line 1, column 574, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'satellites'' or 'satellite's'?
Suggestion: satellites'; satellite's
... they did prove it with the help of the satellites camera by bleak all the information aro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 799, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1900s'.
Suggestion: during the 1900s
...onal force explained by Albert Einstein during 1900s because there was no physical proof or ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 856, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...use there was no physical proof or they dont have any instruments to validate the ei...
^^^^
Line 1, column 918, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...nts to validate the einstein hypothesis thats why Einstein had to support his theory ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 359, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e news channel is so big over our life. Because we always seek the truth from in their ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 606, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e. Also, confuse the literate part too. in conclusion, I want to say that every ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
..., confuse the literate part too. in conclusion, I want to say that every ar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, so, then, for example, i mean, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2190.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 448.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88839285714 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66997131281 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544642857143 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.7024945261 60.3974514979 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.285714286 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.28571428571 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0657832795606 0.243740707755 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.019242831451 0.0831039109588 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290655034131 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.044880560488 0.150359130593 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039491857393 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.