Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
In the age of information, achieving the rank of hero is a difficult task. Media are perpetually looking for fresh stories to captivate audiences and boost ratings and sales. In this new model of news, a safe story is one that focuses on an already recognizable topic. To paraphrase one Washington Post reporter in the podcast “Post Reports”, if someone asks you a question about your beat that you do not have that answer to, you should look into it.
While the internet has fostered a more closely connected global community, information both positive and negative can reach wider audiences in a shorter period of time. For people who have already reached notoriety, the likelihood of widespread information sharing is greater through the use of tags and searches. This means rising stars with positive reputations could quickly fall from grace within hours of a story.
It is also true, however, that modern-day heroes exist. The late Senator John McCain was widely regarded as a hero for his contributions to American society. His reputation as a war hero and a dedicated public servant lives on. Senator McCain was in the public eye during the age of information and was scrutinized under the recent administration for his disagreements with the White House administration. He was not a perfect man, his flaws were reported on, but they were determined by society to be less significant than his positive attributes.
To err is human; the extent to which an error is weighted is the determining factor of a hero. The significance of an error is cultural or may be mitigated by other factors. What is taboo in one region may be commonplace in another. It may be more difficult to become a modern-day hero, but it is not impossible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Morienta | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Nico Lingga | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | shivamchug | 54 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
- Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 50
- In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel 36
- Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's rec 59
- The following report appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council."An innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in our schools and workplaces. A study reports that in nearby 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... can reach wider audiences in a shorter period of time. For people who have already reached no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1462.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 295.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95593220339 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95533348003 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.4932671777 127% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9545419919 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.375 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163988833277 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475167036698 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032918264714 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08226512256 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0275390206418 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.