Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is
No meticulous scrutiny will be able to diminish the reputation of a hero who has no flaws and hence, society can still consider any living man or woman as a hero if he/she deserves this extol.
Human being can hardly thrive without a society. There are certain person in the society who are not like the others. Having some properties different from an average man or woman those persons are regarded as extraordinary. Society can call them ''HERO''. For being hero one has to be flawless, should not have any property which can diminish his reputation and all the heroes who lived in the material earth and those who are still living with us all are of such kinds. For example, Sheikh Hasina, running prime minister of Bangladesh, is considered as the hero of Bangladesh right now. It his her vision and probity along side the quality of being a good politician which have facilitated her to earn this reputation. For her, Bangladesh is now the best country in terms of GDP and becoming a developing country from being a underdeveloped one. It his her, who is looking over everything and making sure that Bangladesh is in in right path to fulfill the dream of Sheikh Mujib, Father of Hasina and the Nation Bangladesh. However, mass media, Bangladesh as well as international, are trying their best to find any flaws of her but they all are thwarted by her integrity and probity. Media is now considering her as a living hero after investigating her thoroughly and for her recent contribution to the Rohinga Society she is now called as Mother of Humanity.
Dr. Md. Yunus the founder of Grameen Bank and the founder of the idea Micro-economics, is considered as a hero among the poor people of Bangladesh. Because of him they could live now with dignity-he provided them with money so that they can start a small business and lead their lives. This contribution of him towards the society has earned him the prestigious Nobel prize. Media of both inside and outside the country after meticulously investigating him and failed to find anything to call him bad, declared him as the hero of the time.
However, there are some person like Ong Sung Suchi, political leader of Myanmar who earned Noble prize for Peace but hardly considered as a hero. Because of being not perfect meticulous scrutiny by media and her recent action earned her this bad name. A real hero is immune to all media scrutiny but Suchi was not that and for this she is hated by most of the people of South-East Asia. Her brutality against Rohinga is unfathomable.
It is the true hero who are not affected by any media scrutiny and deserve reverence from the people of the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Morienta | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | Nico Lingga | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | shivamchug | 54 | view |
| 2019-09-20 | raolitesh@gmail.com | 66 | view |
- Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 58
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the Incoming, local businesses that used to advertise during our late-night news program 55
- Some people suggest that it is wrong to give money to beggars asking for money on the street, while others think that it is the right thing to do. Which point of view do you think is correct, and why? 60
- In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team.Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider range of knowledge, e 73
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smart phones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 68, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'people', 'persons'?
Suggestion: people; persons
...ve without a society. There are certain person in the society who are not like the oth...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 616, Rule ID: ALONG_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'alongside'?
Suggestion: alongside
...ight now. It his her vision and probity along side the quality of being a good politician ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 823, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ecoming a developing country from being a underdeveloped one. It his her, who is...
^
Line 3, column 860, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng a underdeveloped one. It his her, who is looking over everything and making su...
^^
Line 3, column 924, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...hing and making sure that Bangladesh is in in right path to fulfill the dream of Shei...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 25, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'people', 'persons'?
Suggestion: people; persons
... of the time. However, there are some person like Ong Sung Suchi, political leader o...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, so, still, well, as to, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2190.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 465.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70967741935 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64555989653 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468817204301 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2660333705 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.285714286 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22849384188 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720482209533 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652415580277 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150225182361 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773774923638 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.