That law plays a significant role in every human society is an undeniable fact. Should officials realize the advantages of the law in the prosperity of the society they will ponder over legislation and execution of the law much more scrupulously. Law is an integrity part of the every human society if people wants to live together in a community they have to legislate and enact laws. The effects of the law on people intention and changing their hearts and minds has recently been the topic of debate among experts.
I do believe that law can solve many problems of the modern societies and these are my justifications. To begin with imagining a country without law, we can see what would happen if there is not law. From ancient times human try to live in groups and in a larger form, society, they try to set some rules and governing systems to govern over the people wich means to control them and force them to follow the rules and laws. from that time humanity starts to grow and make larger communities, cities, and country. These laws make it possible to live together and help each other to reach achievements which were not possible to achieve singular. Therefore, by looking back to the history, we can see the effect and helpfulness of the law.
The second reason why I advocate this point of view lies in the fact that every law has a logical reason behind it if official aware the people about these logics, people changes their mind, accept the law and obey. If experts train the children to obey the law by apprising them about the logical reason behind the laws, then we have people which obey the rules not because of the fear of the punishment but because they believe that it by their heart and mind. Therefore, execution of the laws helps to train and change the people mind.
Finally, having law is important but executing and supervising this execution is more important because if you do not execute law it is like do not having a law. Hence, besides law legislation, we must make systems to execute and govern people.
Having discussed the issue from that point of view I would rather look at it from another perspective as well. The laws without logical reasons cannot last for a long time, and cannot change the people mind. Thus, laws must be logical and fulfill the people interests. Moreover, training people and convincing them to obey the rules has much less expensive for government and society and it is not possible to superintend the people during every moment of the day. Consequently, a law cannot solve every single but many of the problems of a human community.
By taking all above-mentioned arguments into consideration, the following conclusion can be drawn about the issue. Underestimating the advantages of the law in prosperity and progression of a human society in not logical. Attending to this issue meticulously contributes to teaching people the logics and reasons behind every law, and can improve several aspects of the humanity.
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do 87
- TPO 6, Task 1 90
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 90
- TPO7 (integrated) 70
- Do you agree or disagree with following statement? Parents today are more involved in their children's education than were parents in the past. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 425, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
...orce them to follow the rules and laws. from that time humanity starts to grow and m...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, finally, hence, if, look, moreover, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2472.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 517.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78143133462 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76839952204 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6173564941 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450676982592 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 792.0 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4560674726 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.47826087 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4782608696 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13043478261 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294976152737 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0974488582516 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573217547277 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158555941035 0.150359130593 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414526319625 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.