Claim: In order to help small businesses thrive, government should play a minimal role in private business matters.
Wrote a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and / or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The role of private industries in the economy of a country or in global economy is crucial and the support they provide to the economy can not be overlooked. Take General Electornics for example. During the time of great depression, the behemoth was responsible for almost 1% of the GDP of United States. However, these kind of revenues give the industries the power of influence, to get what they need by any means possible, which in turn leaves the small businesses vulnerable. There should be certain boundaries under which any organisation must operate. And it is the responsibility of the government to create such boundaries.
The practice of overtaking a small organisation by a big industry is not uncommon.The recent hostile takeover of Mindtree, an indian IT firm, by Larsen and Toubro (L&T) is a good example. L&T invested a huge amount of money almost a decade ago in Mindtree, and since then the conflict is going on. Finally it ended with L&T engulfing Mindtree.
Moreover, taking over another industry is only one thing. There are many ways in which a large-scale financial system can affect small businesses. During the 'dot-com bubble', Netscape released it's browser to browse the internet in an interactive and user friendly way. Netscape created the browser for Windows platform. However, Microsoft, the creator of Windows, had monopoly over the market as almost 70% of the computer then (and till this date) were running on Windows. Taking the dot-com bubble and the increasing popularity of Netscape into account, Microsoft released it's own browser called Internet Explorer which was pre-installed in any system and unlike Netscape, it was free.
Netscape sued Microsoft for taking advantage of it's monopoly over the market and the case was in the court of law for almost 7 years, damaging the reputation of a multi national organisation.
However, not all the time the takeover has to be hostile. There are many examples in which the acquisition of a small industry by a large industry is turned out to be successful. Acquisition of YouTube by Google, Flipkart by Wallmart, Instagram by Facebook to name a few. But the acquisition has to be agreed upon by both the side, not forced by one on another. And many times a small business has no say in that because of the power and influence these large-scale industries can have. For that, the government should interfere and set some boundaries under which every organisation has to operate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...% of the GDP of United States. However, these kind of revenues give the industries the pow...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 82, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ation by a big industry is not uncommon.The recent hostile takeover of Mindtree, an...
^^^
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'firms'?
Suggestion: firms
...tile takeover of Mindtree, an indian IT firm, by Larsen and Toubro L&T is a good exa...
^^^^
Line 2, column 296, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...nd since then the conflict is going on. Finally it ended with L&T engulfing Mindtree. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, look, moreover, so, then, as to, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2049.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 410.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99756097561 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83910087065 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519512195122 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3877598849 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1363636364 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45454545455 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125198169116 0.243740707755 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357371802002 0.0831039109588 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366634698655 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.062613776248 0.150359130593 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532118410723 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.