Claim: Restaurants should be required to display nutritional information about the food they serve
Reason: This knowledge will help diners make healthy choices and reduce their risk of diet
related health problems
Would displaying nutritional information about food served in restaurants help tailor diners' healthy choices? Some would argue that such information would help diners choose wisely considering their risk of developing diet-related problems. However, others would argue that diners can make right decisions on what diet will benefit them without the nutritional information being displayed. After, weighing the evidence, it is certain that nutritional information makes for better diet decision and result in limited health problems compared to when they are not displayed.
Now consider how nutritional information would help diners. A peptic Ulcer patient will greatly appreciate the nutritional information a restaurant displays since it will help him choose food that would not aggravate the ulcer. Ulcer patients usually avoid foods that a pepperi and very salty. In addition, such patients also avoid food that is hard. If ever, they eat this kind of food without prior information, they could break down and would need medical attention. This would result in the loss of productive hours. Therefore, displaying the nutritional information of diet will greatly help diners' choices considering their health status.
Like a peptic Ulcer patient, people who have had a history of diabetes in their lineage would also cherish a restaurant that displays of nutritional information. People from such families have the tendency to develop Diabetes. This disease is chronic and no cure has being found for it till date. Hence, family members who have not developed the disease would begin to discipline themselves to eat certain foods that will keep them healthy. In this case, foods that are high in sugar would be avoided. Thus, displaying information on the nutritional components of diets will advise such people to make proper diet and health decision.
Some would argue that displaying the nutritional content of food will attract extra cost, thereby increasing the cost of food in such restaurants. In addition, some may argue that most people have a knowledge of the nutritional information needed to avoid ill health. So, displaying further nutritional information on foods adds no value as these may not be checked. However, considering the benefit of displaying the nutrition information of foods will help advise customers on choosing the best food that will help maintain good health, it is better to have the information printed and displayed. Moreover, people who value the nutritional information display would be glad to pay for extra cost incurred to printing and displaying such information
In conclusion, it is clear that displaying nutritional information helps diners make better decisions on diets that will benefit their health as compared to when the information is not displayed. Ulcer patients and people who are trying to avoid developing cancer will greatly appreciate such information. In all cases, displaying the nutritional information will benefit everyone including those who already know exactly what they want in a meal
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-31 | Mateo Chen | 66 | view |
| 2022-08-27 | David91 | 62 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | David Olatunji | 54 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | David Olatunji | 54 | view |
| 2022-08-13 | David Olatunji | 54 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g the cost of food in such restaurants. In addition, some may argue that most ...
^^
Line 4, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ants. In addition, some may argue that most people have a knowledge of the nutr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in all cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 30.0 12.4196629213 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2588.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 473.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47145877378 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66353547975 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81534696731 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.429175475687 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 761.4 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 64.406424369 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.833333333 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7083333333 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432263842179 0.243740707755 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144394563321 0.0831039109588 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103609453705 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282309059234 0.150359130593 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.070930868603 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.