Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists. Reason: The surest indicator of a great nation is actually the welfare of all its people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Indicators of a great nation imbibe welfare of all without any discrimination on the basis of gender, race, and ethnicity. Ideology of nationalism begins with its people, where denizens sharing same territorial, geographical, ethnic, and cultural boundaries identify themselves with each other. The main, foremost, important part of a nation is its people. The idea of nationalism disseminated among people as they realized their rights were oppressed by monarchies, theocracies, dictatorships around the globe. Here, only few among the affluent sections would be the main focus of territory. No nation can be great if it neglects or flouts its obligation to common people.
Nation resembles its citizens, and unless they are collectively uplifted, it cannot reach apotheosis. Several components, such as hunger index, infant mortality, health care, education, and security of minorities, would make a nation achieve greatness. These criteria, on which current progress is compared, can be achieved only and only if all the section of society is taken care of. It is a thing of past, where dictators and monarchs would enjoy extreme supremacy, and their achievements would make the whole empire great. Achievements of alexander the great and territorial extension of Ottoman Empire were thought to be indicator of great nation.
Similarly, achievement of Hitler and Napoleon could not make their nation great, as a large chunk of their nation was living under poverty and being ill-treated. Their empire included reputed artists and scientists; they achieved great success and accolades, but these accolades and successes could not benefit common mass. In current world, several countries have wealthy and effluent upper class but their common people struggle to keep their basic needs satisfied. In Syria millions of people die of hunger, poverty, and due to lack of health care. At the same time, their scientists have developed weapon of mass destruction, bio-chemical weapons have been used. This surely does not qualify a nation to be great.
- Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.Reason: The world today is significantly more complex than it was even in the relatively recent past.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 50
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little. 58
- The following was presented as part of a business plan by Apex Corporation."To answer the increased demand for artisan coffee, Apex Corporation is releasing a new line of coffee, "Gourmet Select." Apex Corporation will first introduce the coffee into majo 58
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 75
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 569, Rule ID: MAIN_FOCUS[1]
Message: Use simply 'focus'.
Suggestion: focus
...mong the affluent sections would be the main focus of territory. No nation can be great if...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs satisfied" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'satisfiing' or 'to be satisfied'.
Suggestion: satisfiing; to be satisfied
...ople struggle to keep their basic needs satisfied. In Syria millions of people die of hun...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'similarly', 'so', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.271739130435 0.240241500013 113% => OK
Verbs: 0.130434782609 0.157235817809 83% => OK
Adjectives: 0.114130434783 0.0880659088768 130% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0326086956522 0.0497285424764 66% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0516304347826 0.0444667217837 116% => OK
Prepositions: 0.10597826087 0.12292977631 86% => OK
Participles: 0.0326086956522 0.0406280797675 80% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.8538719078 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0135869565217 0.030933414821 44% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0625 0.0997080785238 63% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0244565217391 0.0249443105267 98% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00815217391304 0.0148568991511 55% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2050.0 2732.02544248 75% => OK
No of words: 318.0 452.878318584 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.4465408805 6.0361032391 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.58838876751 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.430817610063 0.366273622748 118% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.308176100629 0.280924506359 110% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.220125786164 0.200843997647 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.160377358491 0.132149295362 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8538719078 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 219.290929204 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616352201258 0.48968727796 126% => OK
Word variations: 71.4488708237 55.4138127331 129% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 18.7058823529 23.380412469 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3476104982 59.4972553346 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.588235294 141.124799967 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 23.380412469 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.294117647059 0.674092028746 44% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.94800884956 61% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 49.5234924158 51.4728631049 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.91139240506 1.64882698954 116% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464771303067 0.391690518653 119% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.105305308012 0.123202303941 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0612183396932 0.077325440228 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.469878645406 0.547984918172 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.10236843665 0.149214159877 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184094309637 0.161403998019 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111796493165 0.0892212321368 125% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.416103960922 0.385218514788 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0163023045109 0.0692045440612 24% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.357480463598 0.275328986314 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932258778793 0.0653680567796 143% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.