Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradicts our own.
Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
It is true that debating can cause mental stress and even create conflict while we disagree with each other. But if everybody simply agrees and confirms on one thing, what is going to happen in the world? Of course, it will be easier to manipulate the society. Is this a right way for an efficient learning? Absolutely not! Without conflicting and having an argument, I believe one cannot have the opportunity to widen one’s thoughts.
Because we challenge ideas, we are able to discover and learn many other important things, which we possibly wouldn’t have thought on the first place. For example, consider the flat earth theory. Earlier people used to believe and were living with an idea that we are living on a flat earth. Until, in 5BC, Pythagoras came up with an outstandingly ridiculous thought, of Earth being a sphere rather than flat. Eventually, after deepest strenuous study and debate, this claim got proved. If he never had a disagreeing claim, we would never have learned the significant fact about our planet Earth. Furthermore, what if Columbus never wondered about having a huge land beyond the gigantic ocean? He would never have discovered the land of America. In this regards, I believe, we, as a human being, cannot learn the deepest points of any issue, without having a conflicting opinion.
Having a disagreement is necessary to find the flaws in our opinions as well. If everyone simply agrees on one point, and there is nobody to point it out, it will be difficult to find any fallacy. Adam Smith believed in invisible hands that solved major problem in the market. Earlier, many people and the Government blindly followed Capitalism ‘All mighty is the Money’. However, there were people who proclaimed the relationship between the labours and the bourgeois. Question raised, why the labours are the poor ones and the bourgeois are the rich ones. If there was no listening and learning from Communism, there would not have been a world, like the world we live in today, where the Government provide welfare to the workers and implements the private property systems.
Of course, life would have been easier if everyone simply agrees on one thing. Since, every individual is different and has a different perspective towards different things; there are many other possibilities on concluding to a fact. So considering the theories of various thought processes and opinions across the human history, disagreement and interacting with the people of having contradicting viewpoints plays an essential part of one’s learning. If someone really wants to widen the thought process, which is nothing but developing new ideas by learning things from different resources, they must have a discourse with someone who sees an issue from a different angle.
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves.Examples of altruism 73
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 75
- College and university should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country. 83
- Colleges and universities should require all faculties to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach. 50
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 756, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...have discovered the land of America. In this regards, I believe, we, as a human bein...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... without having a conflicting opinion. Having a disagreement is necessary to fi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, really, so, well, while, for example, of course, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2348.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12663755459 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73237900113 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563318777293 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.1184836163 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.92 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.32 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151573870269 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377129313608 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439934310881 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889782663714 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199522293921 0.0667264976115 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.