College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.
The belief that selecting the field for study should depend on the availabilty of the job in that field is a controversial one. This issue is increasingly important in today's diversified world. In current scenario selecting a field or course on the basis of the current job availabilty can lead to serious problem in future. Many people believe that selecting a course field on the basis job would ease the process of getting job after study, but these people overlook the scenario, that the demand for this is in current period one cannot predict with certainity what would happen in future. In this essay, I will argue that rather than selecting field on the basis of the job availablity, one should select the field on the basis of his/her interest.
There are many good reasons for selecting job in the area we have interest. Firstly, taking a job in the area of interest would give us the needed push and confidence to face problems and also think innovatively to solve or move around it. Passion is of greater importance then profession. Taking a field of our interest we would be able to excel to the highest position in that field and in turn would in turn lead the way of entire company/Organisation in that field. No other thing makes one happy other than leading an organisation or company from end.
Usually a course or study in a particular field needs more that 2 years. And within this period there can be a change in the availablity of the job of that field. So no one can accurately judge or say that uptill what time this field would be able to generate jobs. For example, one of my friend with me in high grades took Electronics and Communication(EC) as his bachelor's course. At that time EC field at highest pay and job availability, but within next three years the job availablity decreased drastically and he had to struggle for getting a job.
Continuing the above said, if one is working in the field of his interest and if there is a recession for that particular field, still he/she would be standing out of the crowd and would be first in the queue for job.
I have argued that taking a job on the basis of interest and passion rather than availabilty of job would give the person an upper hand overall the upcoming difficulty, and on the other said one would need to change the field of study or wait for the job availability. Finally, passion is like a stream of water it would make it way on its own either by breaking things coming in middle or by moving around it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-30 | sandeshbhandari2 | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-22 | shingwa | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | lucy2244 | 79 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | christine_cui | 54 | view |
- Theories about risk-taking personality 73
- Young people enjoy life more than older people do. 73
- A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys 50
- Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have complained, indicating that 98 people out of 100 are happy with the change. Furthermore, many se 29
- Professors should attain tv shows or not 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...availabilty can lead to serious problem in future. Many people believe that selecting a c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 583, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...edict with certainity what would happen in future. In this essay, I will argue that rathe...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, so, still, then, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2056.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 451.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55875831486 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63630862301 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450110864745 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 650.7 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3737931192 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.222222222 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0555555556 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.11111111111 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2687839598 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106097259828 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934769037126 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169971110158 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521610122949 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 48.8420337079 129% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.