The author introduces an interesting idea concerning requiring students to spend at least one semester studying abroad. Admittedly, studying in a foreign country may offer several benefits, depending on context. However, the statement is bold and absurd due to overlooking many important considerations and obstacles.
Perhaps the biggest obstacle to foreign travel is financial in nature. Some students simply would not be able to afford studying abroad. Traveling requires documentation, fees, and other expenses. Many students work while attending school in order to supplement income. Traveling would require one to quit their job, at least on temporary terms. Additionally, the cost of living in foreign countries may be dramatically different, and individuals may not be able to successfully adjust.
Moreover, students are not all created equal. Many students return to school at a later in life. Some already having or being a part of a family. Uprooting individuals to travel for a semester or more can be devastating to interdependent units. It would be unrealistic and expensive to move significant others and/or children to foreign locations solely for short lived study requirements.
There are indeed some situations where studying abroad would offer benefits. If perhaps your area of interest had resources more readily available in certain parts of the world, travel would be appropriate. For instance, if one is interested in studying medicine, traveling to a country where medical technology is superior would clearly offer advantages. It is doubtful that all areas of impoverished East Africa offer the same advantages urban, modern medical centers in the United States would. Similarly, if one’s study concerns Aztec archaeology, spending time near the physical ancient ruins located in the Yucatan would be extremely warranted.
In conclusion, traveling to a foreign country may offer benefits depending on area of interest and location . However, pragmatism and cost are considerable obstacles that would make such a requirement unrealistic.
- Some people believe that in order to thrive, a society must put its own overall success before the well-being of its individual citizens. Others believe that the well-being of a society can only be measured by the general welfare of all its people. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 58
- Claim: Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience.Reason: People who lack experience are free to imagine what is possible without the constraints of established habits and attitudes.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you a 58
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 58
- Issue Type - College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to study'.
Suggestion: to study
...ents simply would not be able to afford studying abroad. Traveling requires documentatio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 108, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...pending on area of interest and location . However, pragmatism and cost are consid...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, may, moreover, similarly, so, while, at least, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 33.0505617978 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 312.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67307692308 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07274837966 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589743589744 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2154367306 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.2857142857 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8571428571 23.4991977007 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161533113929 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526334445819 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492941518084 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0998129531362 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417864237099 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.01 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.