Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
In this era of technology, every aspects of communicating is very advanced and e-mailing is one of the most significant among them. Considering the huge impact it bears in the communication of any company, this prompt suggests that e-mail correspondence of the company employees needs to be monitored in a routine basis by the company management. In my opinion, i strongly disagree with this stance for two reasons.
while, the idea of having a check on the e-mail correspondences of the employees may seem very appealing to the authority, it is clearly unethical and invading in the personal space of a citizen and so to some extent against the law. For instance, if an employee chooses e-mailing as a medium for communicating with his family and close ones, he may share his personal issues in his mails. Now, if he comes across with some issues with the authority, it is very possible that he may vent out his stress via e-mail. Now this can create a really complicated situation. While it will clearly impact negatively on his image in the company, in reality, he didn't do anything wrong. Nevertheless the consequences will be against him. Thus, this one step hugely invades in the personal space of any employee and therefore ruins the a healthy atmosphere for working. Moreover, if any employee decides to take chances for better opportunities in other companies, via the monitoring it will create an upheaval in his image to the authorities. This is something expected the least by any employee.
Further, in reality this whole monitoring process will use a lot of resources like time and system capacity which is exactly opposite to the expectation of the company.For instance, if a company has 200 employees, and it decides to monitor the e-mail correspondences of each employee in a routine basis, the company will need manpower for this job and they will need huge time and technical capacity to do the whole process of monitoring. It has to either recruit more employees or allot existing employees this job in the place of other company works. In both way, the company is increasing the cost in cost of less efficiency. So clearly, this step is far away from full filling the very purpose of this step.
Of course, some may say that for the sake of the company's own security and benefit, monitoring the digital communication of the employees is a good initiative. But something unethical and harmful for the employees can hardly increase the efficiency of the company consisting the very employees. It will only upset the workers. So, no matter how effective it may look, monitoring the digital communication of the employees is an impractical and unethical idea.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | himanshu mardikar | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | Chayank_11 | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | chapagain08 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Walia Farzana | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | anusingh | 75 | view |
- "We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whoseviews contradict our own."; disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning." 66
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 58
- Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits. 16
- Did bees (a type of insect) exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200- million-year-old fossilized trees i 73
- TPO-24 - Integrated Writing Task Animal fossils usually provide very little opportunity to study the actual animal tissues, because in fossils the animals' living tissues have been largely replaced by minerals. Thus, scientists were very excited recently 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ee with this stance for two reasons. while, the idea of having a check on the e-ma...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to e-mail'.
Suggestion: to e-mail
...w. For instance, if an employee chooses e-mailing as a medium for communicating with his ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 652, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...is image in the company, in reality, he didnt do anything wrong. Nevertheless the con...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 677, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...in reality, he didnt do anything wrong. Nevertheless the consequences will be against him. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 821, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...ace of any employee and therefore ruins the a healthy atmosphere for working. Moreove...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...osite to the expectation of the company.For instance, if a company has 200 employee...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for instance, of course, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2234.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94247787611 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92714081317 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482300884956 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.7702113476 60.3974514979 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.7 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0378857205499 0.243740707755 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0129800763737 0.0831039109588 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0125962666435 0.0758088955206 17% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0252943653417 0.150359130593 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0059304310079 0.0667264976115 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.