Creativity should be used as the only true measure of intelligence.
The idea of pivoting creativity as the sole measure of intelligence may not be entirely correct. It can be a measure in some of the cases but not for all. There are several other indicators, which may be a better representation of an individuals intelligence.
From the historical and present examples it is clearly seen that those who are creative have displayed higher level of intelligence than others in their fields. Mozart, Picasso and Elon Musk to name a few of those venerated personalities who have innovated displaying their mastery in the fields. Creativity in itself is an abstract term referring to something that is out of the ordinary and therefore somebody with higher intelligence can achieve it. Therefore we tend to relate creativity as a measure of intelligence.
The other side is when we reason out whether creativity is the only measure of intelligence. A person who is intelligent may not be creative at all. Or vice-versa a creative person may not be intelligent in mathematics but good in music. Several professions that are considered not so creative like accounting, management and house-keeping may have individuals who are intelligent engaged in them.
To summarize it will be a parochial to label creativity as a identifier of intelligence. We need to be more creative in setting up the indicators ourself.
- In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers, CleanAll was found to remove 40% more dirt and kill 30% more bacteria than the next best cleanser. Furthermore, a study showed that employees working at buildings cleaned with CleanAll used far 66
- Schools should do more to prepare students for the non- academic aspect of adulthood 58
- In order to help small businesses thrive, government should play a minimal role in private business matters. 41
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should 58
- The internet is viewed as an excellent means of communication by many. However, there are some who would argue that it is actually destroying our communication skills. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ntirely correct. It can be a measure in some of the cases but not for all. There are severa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ch may be a better representation of an individuals intelligence. From the historical a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ith higher intelligence can achieve it. Therefore we tend to relate creativity as a measu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...e. The other side is when we reason out whether creativity is the only measure ...
^^^
Line 7, column 60, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...l be a parochial to label creativity as a identifier of intelligence. We need to ...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.207627118644 0.240241500013 86% => OK
Verbs: 0.161016949153 0.157235817809 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.10593220339 0.0880659088768 120% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0381355932203 0.0497285424764 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0508474576271 0.0444667217837 114% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135593220339 0.12292977631 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0381355932203 0.0406280797675 94% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.27384766176 2.79330140395 117% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0254237288136 0.030933414821 82% => OK
Particles: 0.00423728813559 0.0016655270985 254% => OK
Determiners: 0.101694915254 0.0997080785238 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0338983050847 0.0249443105267 136% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0338983050847 0.0148568991511 228% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1348.0 2732.02544248 49% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 220.0 452.878318584 49% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.12727272727 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.58838876751 84% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.363636363636 0.366273622748 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.318181818182 0.280924506359 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.240909090909 0.200843997647 120% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.181818181818 0.132149295362 138% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27384766176 2.79330140395 117% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 219.290929204 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518181818182 0.48968727796 106% => OK
Word variations: 46.8950999887 55.4138127331 85% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6194690265 63% => OK
Sentence length: 16.9230769231 23.380412469 72% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8549050151 59.4972553346 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.692307692 141.124799967 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9230769231 23.380412469 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.384615384615 0.674092028746 57% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 48.7412587413 51.4728631049 95% => OK
Elegance: 1.52542372881 1.64882698954 93% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354219896005 0.391690518653 90% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.164155970305 0.123202303941 133% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0990789930717 0.077325440228 128% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.583373897197 0.547984918172 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.109642295065 0.149214159877 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166229425694 0.161403998019 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12726519203 0.0892212321368 143% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.233276106056 0.385218514788 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0531445855914 0.0692045440612 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25499836591 0.275328986314 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0900224440893 0.0653680567796 138% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.30420353982 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.70907079646 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 6.0 13.5995575221 44% => More topic words wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 41.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.