The graph below gives information about how people in the United Kingdom spend their income. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant.
The graph shows the spending pattern of people in the United Kingdom as a percentage of income spent on food, education and entertainment.
There people are divided in three separate categories titled as poorest, middle income and richest. First trend that we see is that the poorest people in the UK spend almost two third of their income on food and less than one tenth on education and entertainment. On the contrary, the rich people see an opposite trend, where almost equal expenditure is made on food, education and entertainment. The middle income prefers to spend moderately high on food but expenses made on education are highest amongst all other category of people. Entertainment is seen as the area where middle income people are bit spendthrift.
Overall we see from the graph that as the income of people increase, their spending on food decrease and entertainment increases. While education is a major expense area only for the middle income earning category of people.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-07-03 | kaka singh | 74 | view |
- The graph below gives information about how people in the United Kingdom spend their income Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 76
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 47
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults. 68
- "For many years the city of Grandview has provided annual funding for the Grandview Symphony. Last year, however, private contributions to the symphony increased by 200 percent and attendance at the symphony's concerts-in-the-park series doubled. The symp 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 54
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'if', 'third', 'while', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.316384180791 0.268076937826 118% => OK
Verbs: 0.118644067797 0.116061578633 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.107344632768 0.0759168565197 141% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0225988700565 0.0366838410393 62% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0225988700565 0.0131127313244 172% => OK
Prepositions: 0.158192090395 0.155750635184 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0395480225989 0.0379272487307 104% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.78784238951 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00564971751412 0.0210936926555 27% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.090395480226 0.0948980150116 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0169491525424 0.00967000014798 175% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 988.0 1161.00487805 85% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.9 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.06134969325 5.90752243213 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73763899035 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.38036809816 0.337110787985 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.245398773006 0.247514529752 99% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.171779141104 0.171178102325 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.110429447853 0.112407865282 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78784238951 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521472392638 0.546246751206 95% => OK
Word variations: 42.3458243 49.3433353143 86% => OK
How many sentences: 8.0 8.93414634146 90% => OK
Sentence length: 20.375 23.0094962315 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9057787955 42.9750493124 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.5 135.714022679 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 23.0094962315 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.689975730869 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 44.9148773006 47.7609492067 94% => OK
Elegance: 3.13793103448 2.94281807926 107% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356467524382 0.418131533498 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.18138126865 0.181151798455 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.081377400035 0.0850326197045 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.657259885259 0.706616315825 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.171109959284 0.157042692854 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.209722728749 0.228904883108 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862573840993 0.108899403657 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.494888577133 0.367819155151 135% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0317420698887 0.0812612215331 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314653157063 0.316326947829 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421167563314 0.0921553760075 46% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70731707317 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.14146341463 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.08536585366 49% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.16585365854 126% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 0.956097560976 209% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.02926829268 66% => OK
Total topic words: 8.0 7.1512195122 112% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.