It is undoubtedly agreed that feedbacks and opinions from others, no matter experts or layman, are crucial to any work in any given field. Those judgement could let the works' authors know its shortcomings and what possible enhancements could be carried out. However, not every comment share the same significance. Usaually, the most valuable judgements come from experts in that aspect.
Everyone is able to give critical feedback towards any product based on their own perceptions and past experiences. Let's say when a software enginner developing a mobile app. He and his professional fellows might examine the app by how its modules are structured, how are the logics and algorithms derived or how the syntax is organised, but they might overlook the importance of artistics design of the user interface. A computer layman, who doesn't know much about the inner mechanism of a mobile app, could able to give feedback on the apperance and usability of the app. Ideas from inexperienced stakeholders might worth acknowledging, but somehow those ideas are not as critical as those given by experts.
Take the example of buidlnig a mobile app which mentioned in the last paragraph. Although the inconsistence in colour allocation or font sizes might cause inconvenience and uncomfortable to the users, they do not affect the actual functionality of the app itself. If this app is providing mobile banking services, a IT layman could not be be able to point out the potential secuirty loopholes in the app design. If such loopholes are existed and not identified, serious personal information leakage or detrimental service break down would be happened when the app is under maliscious attacks. An expert in network security could instead be able to diagnoise those hidden risks and help fixing the bugs before it turns into serious incidents. In that case, judgements are far more practical when they are coming from experts.
Indeed, being an experts in certain field, he or she should be experienced enough to tackle issues not only concernnig in this field, but also the other related areas. Take a look into that when a pastry chef is making cakes for a bakery. Packaging if cakes should be the business of the marketing staffs. However, the chef himself know better of how to keep the the cake in the best condition. He might have enagaged into the pastry industry for more than 10 years and have tried producing cake storing box before. And hence the chef could give more pratical comments in designing a cake package box then the marketing team.
To conclude, judgements are useful no matter where is it coming from. But only when the ideas are coming from expertised fellows, a huge positive impact could be caused and the level of improvement would be greatly enhanced.
- Some people believe it is often necessary even desirable for political leaders to withhold information from the public Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed
- Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed Reading Course has greatly improved productivity One graduate of the course was able to read a 500 page report in only two hours another graduate rose from an a 83
- Some people believe it is often necessary even desirable for political leaders to withhold information from the public Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed 70
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as mu 83
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them not by their contemporaries
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this judgement' or 'Those judgements'?
Suggestion: This judgement; Those judgements
...crucial to any work in any given field. Those judgement could let the works authors know its sh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...duct based on their own perceptions and past experiences. Lets say when a software enginner deve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...r own perceptions and past experiences. Lets say when a software enginner developing...
^^^^
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... user interface. A computer layman, who doesnt know much about the inner mechanism of ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 315, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'a' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: a; IT
...p is providing mobile banking services, a IT layman could not be be able to point ou...
^^^^
Line 5, column 337, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: be
...banking services, a IT layman could not be be able to point out the potential secuirt...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 687, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to fix' or 'fix'.
Suggestion: to fix; fix
...o diagnoise those hidden risks and help fixing the bugs before it turns into serious i...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 360, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...chef himself know better of how to keep the the cake in the best condition. He might ha...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 360, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...chef himself know better of how to keep the the cake in the best condition. He might ha...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2326.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 463.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02375809935 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73010019845 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546436285097 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 734.4 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5210032164 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.130434783 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1304347826 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.95652173913 5.21951772744 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121540233767 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0370736037589 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503836078878 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0745769529237 0.150359130593 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463252743215 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.