"Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field."
The statement contends that the critical judgement of any work in any field is perfect if it is done by the person who is expert in that field but it is imperfect or of less value if it is done by any random person. I agree with this statement to some extent.
As per the statement the judgement of any work should be done by expert of that field only . This statement is basically true as for judging any kind of work the deep knowledge about the work is crucial. For example if any experiment is carried out in the laboratory and for judging the outcome of it, it is necessary to have the deep knowledge about that experiment because any wrong judgement can lead to great disasters. In the above case if the judgement is carried out by any person having superficial knowledge about that experiment than it can lead to wrong judgement which can be sometimes dangerous.
Another example can be that if any exam papers are checked by any person having less knowledge of that subject that it can lead to imperfect grading of the papers. On the other side, if in case it is required to judge very normal basic thing than it can be also be done by the person having little knowledge in that field because if any expert is called upon for judging such small things than it would be economically costly or sometimes the experts would also not be willing to come. For example if it is required to do any normal inspection of the object where greater perfection is not required in any field than the person with superficial knowledge can also give the better judgement and it would also be economical in that case.
In conclusion the type of the person to be called for judgement like expert or person with superficial knowledge in that field depends upon the amount of perfection required in judgement for that particular thing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-12-20 | harsh.dota | 50 | view |
| 2016-12-20 | harsh.dota | 50 | view |
- "Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field." 50
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own. 50
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues."Over the past year, the Crust Copper Company (CCC) has purchased over 10,000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia. Mining copper on this land wi 58
- "The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority." 50
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a journal on environmental issues."Over the past year, the Crust Copper Company (CCC) has purchased over 10,000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia. Mining copper on this land wi 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ree with this statement to some extent. As per the statement the judgement of any ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 91, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...uld be done by expert of that field only . This statement is basically true as for...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, as for, for example, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 329.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.54407294833 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49997061507 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 215.323595506 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.367781155015 0.4932671777 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 489.6 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences, or put a space between two sentences.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.5802165504 60.3974514979 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.5 118.986275619 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.9 23.4991977007 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168299107005 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914565342083 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779720981781 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12933177568 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062459219143 0.0667264976115 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.8420337079 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.64 12.1639044944 79% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 100.480337079 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.