Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Constructive criticism in any field is valuable no matter the source. Being open to criticism is important because it allows one to gain a different perspective of one’s work. Feedback received from both experts in the field and laymen can definitely be insightful. Though the opinion of connoisseurs in the field are definetely more valuable, there are a number of cases where everyone’s point of view is equally important.
A good example of a field where people’s opinion is of utmost importance is politics. In any democracy, a politician must take into consideration the views of the public while framing laws and making policy. To frame policies that are just and that take into account the priorities of the entire population, it is vital that representatives from every section of the society have their say in public policy. Feedback from the public can help the government take better decisions that are beneficial to the majority.
Another field where the opinions of non-experts are sought after is software engineering. Feedback loops from the customer play a key role in the software delivery life cycle. It is paramount that software developers lucidly understand the requirements and problems of their customers while designing software. This has given rise to the process of “agile” software development has set the standard for good software development practice in the industry today.
While the criticism from common people can help, the advice and opinions of experts can add more value to one’s work. Experts in any field possess a vast amount of experience and have failed plenty of times. They are aware of the common pitfalls and usually have a broader and deeper understanding of the domain. They can not only offer criticism on the current quality of a person’s work, but can also provide advice on how to improve. Experts can point you in the right direction and can shed light on different perspectives that you never knew existed. For example, take music, art, and dance. Though it is crucial that the perfomer pleases the audience, their feedback can only tell how good they currently are. Expert’s advice on the other hand, can help them realize how they can be better.
In conclusion, everyone’s criticism of an individual’s work is valuable, especially if those are the audience or end-users or benefactors of your work. An expert’s advice is of even more value as their opinions can give you a clearer picture of your mistakes and can also lead you in the right direction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | jinjer | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | __annabelle__ | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | cnegus | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | ken10091995 | 50 | view |
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things. 16
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning. 50
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 60
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings. 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any 20
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2158.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17505995204 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02079468997 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505995203837 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.8093263165 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.0909090909 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9545454545 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22727272727 5.21951772744 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211230714309 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687404305563 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060953420926 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125471934129 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546426205441 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.