The role of experts is to provide a well-evidence suggestion to tackle a certain problem. As experts are those who have built up one's knowledge through many years of learning and experiences, many people ask for help and trust the decisions made by them. However, it is not true that the judgment of work by a layperson is of no value. Rather, this might provide a valuable perspective to solve those issues.
Admittedly, solving a problem requires enough knowledge and expertise which experts have obtained for many years. For instance, during the economic depression, non-specialists do not know how to tackle the depression since they do not know how the economic factors influence the economy. However, the economists can provide appropriate and trustful suggestions to the governments that they could cope with the situation as soon as possible. Likewise, the knowledge and experience in the certain field are necessary to make a critical judgment.
However, the judgments by layperson are of great values when the information of the experts can be limited. For instance, in the indigenous societies, there are much traditional knowledge and skills that people have not discovered yet. Indigenous people in small islands or remote areas do have valuable knowledge about the medical efficacies of plants or flowers. Thus, when treating an indigenous disease that cannot be treated with professional solutions, the judgment by those people who are not experts will be important and precious. Therefore, the critical judgment of indigenous people might solve the disease that could not be solved by experts.
Moreover, in the official development assistance(ODA) field, the judgments and opinions of local people have proven to be critical for the success of the development project. For instance, the development organization such as World Bank made a well for a village in an African country, but the well was built in so much distant place from the walking trails that local people found it hard to walk a long distance to get water from the well. As a result, the project could not increase the level of water distribution among local people. If the project authority had involved the community people during the planning stage, they could have seen a different result. Thus, listening to the judgment of local people can result in a more successful result in projects.
To sum up, experts can play important roles in tackling the issues, but they are not God. Their knowledge might be limited and traditional and local people's judgment can become important to tackle problems and improve the situations.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 57
- When Stanley Park first opened, it was the largest, most heavily used public park in town. It is still the largest park, but it is no longer heavily used. Video cameras mounted in the park's parking lots last month revealed the park's drop in popularity: 75
- The following appeared in a memo from the marketing director of Bargain Brand Cereals."One year ago we introduced our first product, 'Bargain Brand' breakfast cereal. Our very low prices quickly drew many customers away from the top-selling cereal compani 77
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 59
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 50
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
The fourth paragraph can be treated as an example only.
some more arguments, like:
1. A large amount of interdisciplinary fields have been introduced in the human world. Maybe one field is related to another field. While one expert may only know the particular field.
2. On other fields, like politics and commercial world, judgment from a large number of people becomes the most valuable. for example, ordinary customers or users often know better the defects of a product than the expert who designed it. In the realm of politics, the right to judge belongs to ordinary people instead of political experts of any sort.
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 423 350
No. of Characters: 2141 1500
No. of Different Words: 197 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.535 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.061 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.753 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 162 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 130 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 91 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 56 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.15 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.027 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.7 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.305 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.533 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.074 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 546, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... necessary to make a critical judgment. However, the judgments by layperson are...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2198.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19621749409 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82942479968 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486997635934 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 676.8 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2389816791 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.9 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.15 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150382212989 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496462016532 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524164792253 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808899940194 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210773149319 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.