Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.
Communication between people with different viewpoints on either controversial or trivial topics is essential for society's development. The prompt suggests that it is not beneficial for people with opposite viewpoints to discuss controversial topics. Although they might not change their mind, it is very useful and important.
On one hand, people can be rigid about their thoughts. They are not prone to changing their belief system. For instance, when older generations converse with the youth, there is an immense generational gap between their school of thoughts. Senior citizens are too set in their ways to change their mind about their beliefs and ideals that they have followed all their life. A conversation between them would not be of use.
But certain people can be flexible in the way that they think. They can change their mind after hearing more about the reasoning of the other side. If we take a look at the aftermath of the manufacturing of vaccination for Covid-19, there were many people who did not believe in getting vaccinated. But a study by the University of Columbia showed a large increase in the number of people getting vaccinated (who were against the vaccine), after they spoke to various doctors about the benefits and the harm. Hence, this proves that people are willing to question their core beliefs when they talk to people with opposing views.
This prompt is very complex, as humans are complex beings. We definitely have stubborn characteristics as well as a willingness to change. Therefore, there is no harm in having such conversations as the result could be useful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erent viewpoints on either controversial or trivial topics is essential for socie...
^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to set'?
Suggestion: to set
...school of thoughts. Senior citizens are too set in their ways to change their mind abou...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, so, therefore, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 2235.4752809 61% => OK
No of words: 265.0 442.535393258 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11320754717 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75356398719 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577358490566 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 704.065955056 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1765543293 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6875 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5625 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1875 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403261190293 0.243740707755 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126184937785 0.0831039109588 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10004067872 0.0758088955206 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224502954459 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12667788879 0.0667264976115 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 100.480337079 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.