Due to their inherent physical differences, men and women do different tasks unequally.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 434, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... men and women to be unable to complete many different tasks. This can be seen in athletic sp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 778, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en are actually just as up to the task. There is also the belief that women are ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es have hampered his talent or success. Physical differences also do not create ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 575, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ories, despite their different genders. Some might argue that the tasks above ar...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 525, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...being a difference on task performance. Overall, men and women are both able to ...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 102, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: A person; Persons
...e their inherent physical differences. A persons biological gender only creates a differ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 161, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...l gender only creates a difference in a persons ability to do basic bodily functions. ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, so, still, well, while, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 35.0 19.5258426966 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 32.0 14.8657303371 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2723.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 552.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93297101449 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84713113593 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65297007829 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438405797101 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 865.8 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2717498024 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7666666667 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.3 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.496884259659 0.243740707755 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148027254911 0.0831039109588 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104037661025 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285185974719 0.150359130593 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0749427512197 0.0667264976115 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.