Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea

Education is vital to succeed in today’s world whatever may be the career path we choose. In this regard, educational institutions have a responsibility of enabling students with the knowledge and the skills required to succeed in areas of their interest. I take issue with the argument that educational institutions should discourage students from from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed as this argument is inaccurate.

Firstly, teachers cannot gauge every student’s ability based on their limited interactions with them. Teachers, like the rest of us, are humans. They can only make an observation that a student is doing well or not doing well in some area. They cannot be sure that the student will fail at something in the future. There is every possibility that the student will become good at that at some point in the future. Thomas Alva Edison was deemed not fit to study at his school. He was later home-schooled by his mother and he went on to invent the light bulb. As teachers, it’s their responsibility, not to dissuade them from pursuing their interests, but to help them overcome the difficulties they face so that they can succeed.

Secondly, it is the right of every student to choose any career which interests them. Educational institutions should encourage free thinking. Great things come out of thinking without any inhibitions. The world would not be as developed as it is today if people had confined their thoughts and followed a conventional path. The Teslas and Googles of today are evidences for the amazing things that we can achieve by taking the road less traveled. So if Elon’s teacher had discouraged him from following his passion as the chances of succeeding are slim to none and had he agreed to do so, we would not have witnessed these fantastic developments in attempts to find the existence of habitable environment on Mars.

The definition of success is subjective. For some, it might mean leading a routine life with a house in the suburbs with minimal tensions and risks; for some it might be about power or money and for some others it might mean challenging what we know and doing something that’s never done before. None of these are wrong. However, students, at such an early stage in their lives, should not be discouraged from doing something that they might fail at. Educational institutions should make students realize that failure is not the end of the world but a stepping stone towards success.

Preaching that where there is a will, there is a way in the first hour and discouraging a student who wants to become the President of the nation in the next would be contradicting and wrong. It’s the responsibility of the educational institutions to encourage free thinking and equip the students with all they need to achieve their goals in life so that great things happen and that is how we evolve as humans.

Votes
Average: 5.4 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: from
...institutions should discourage students from from pursuing fields of study in which they ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... but a stepping stone towards success. Preaching that where there is a will, th...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2445.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 494.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94939271255 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83518266579 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485829959514 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.3008249702 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.875 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5833333333 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.70833333333 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219864021974 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583842124272 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754770116043 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137470629795 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100699241405 0.0667264976115 151% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.