Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Educational institutes have a pivotal role in eradicating poverty and decreasing illiteracy rate in a country. Educational institutes play an important part in an individual’s life, student build their interest in college and after graduating, they choose their field of interest. Educational institutes guide the students and helps them from getting astray. The decision of an individual for their future should be their own. No educational institute have right to judge students on the basis of their performance. It is not their responsibility to restrict them choosing their field of interest just on the basis of their anticipation.
Student endeavor to achieve their goal, whether they are small or big. But they should follow what seems better to them, they should not listen to anyone, if they think they may succeed they should go for it. People make mistakes but in return they learn more from that mistake. Just like a little kid who is trying to learn walking, but each time the kid falls, he learns and stands again. People are exactly like this kid; they learn from their mistake. However, if someone demotivates them, then they will demure to explore new thing.
To judge a kid is to decimate that special ability inside of them. Everyone has some special abilities inside of them. Someone perceive them early, but some might take long to recognize. Educational institute should not judge from the performance of the student. Some students have their dreams of becoming someone, which they hard to succeed, but if someone demotivate them on the basis of their prediction, then their dream of becoming a doctor, engineer would be destroyed.
However, Educational institution can organize career expo to bolster students, rather than just anticipating their future and demotivating them to pursue their interest. Student then can decide whether they should stand for their interest, or rather just change their field. But this decision should be their, not from the outside. Educational institution should support the students of whatever they want to do, instead of destroying their feeling and emotions.
Educational institution should not dissuade student to pursue their field of study, because their responsibility is to thrive student and give them quality education, rather than to evaluate them and dissuade them to pursue their interest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Kiho Park | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...g, they choose their field of interest. Educational institutes guide the students and helps...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to walk'.
Suggestion: to walk
...ike a little kid who is trying to learn walking, but each time the kid falls, he learns...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'Someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'perceives'.
Suggestion: perceives
...ecial abilities inside of them. Someone perceive them early, but some might take long to...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.209411764706 0.240241500013 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.178823529412 0.157235817809 114% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0494117647059 0.0880659088768 56% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0470588235294 0.0497285424764 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.117647058824 0.0444667217837 265% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.101176470588 0.12292977631 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0305882352941 0.0406280797675 75% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.73449458159 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0423529411765 0.030933414821 137% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0635294117647 0.0997080785238 64% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0352941176471 0.0249443105267 141% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00941176470588 0.0148568991511 63% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2372.0 2732.02544248 87% => OK
No of words: 377.0 452.878318584 83% => OK
Chars per words: 6.29177718833 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.397877984085 0.366273622748 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.283819628647 0.280924506359 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.20424403183 0.200843997647 102% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.116710875332 0.132149295362 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73449458159 2.79330140395 98% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 219.290929204 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485411140584 0.48968727796 99% => OK
Word variations: 51.5998483757 55.4138127331 93% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.1363636364 23.380412469 73% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8486044893 59.4972553346 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.818181818 141.124799967 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1363636364 23.380412469 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.272727272727 0.674092028746 40% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.21349557522 58% => OK
Readability: 45.5183265011 51.4728631049 88% => OK
Elegance: 0.993150684932 1.64882698954 60% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330077694197 0.391690518653 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.139177812725 0.123202303941 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0843960017006 0.077325440228 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.514188901575 0.547984918172 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.154144849903 0.149214159877 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1201774221 0.161403998019 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614699809739 0.0892212321368 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.31070653521 0.385218514788 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.108035964606 0.0692045440612 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218283355347 0.275328986314 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254937308497 0.0653680567796 39% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 7.22455752212 97% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.