Educators should base their assessment of students' learning not on students' grasp of facts but on the ability to explain the ideas, trends, and concepts that those facts illustrate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
In all educational systems, one of the most controversial matters is the criteria that teachers should based their assessments on them . One aspect of this controversy is that somebody believe “Educators should evaluate students’ learning not on their takings of a fact but on their ability to explain the pertaining ideas and concepts that the fact is involved”. In my perspective, there is a narrow gap between these two concept, and a compromise position should be made.
It is admitted that facts are the cornerstone of each field of science and understanding the origins of a concept play a significant role in exploring related consequence and subjects of that fact. But, it should be considered that the main goal of abstract facts is to explain and justify the scientific phenomena that exist in that realm of science.Thus, if a student is capable of understanding such concepts and phenomena, it could be said that they reach the proper level to use such facts, practically. Further, If an student has learnt a fact, perfectly, but he/she could not extent the acquired knowledge to the consequential patterns and concepts, somehow his/her knowledge is useless. The value of facts is to be used in order to extract concepts that are helpful to progress human life. As a consequence, The students’ ability to explain related idea and trends of a fact could be a justifiable criterion in order to measure students learning.
On the other hand, students have different patterns of learning and an individual’s brain concentrates on various aspects of subjects that are taught, due to peoples’ different mental features and activity. It is possible that somebody is more successful in grasping abstract facts and others are more capable in explain relative trends and ideas.Both of them has their own merits and drawbacks. Thus, only considering one aspect in students assessments could not be fair and fails to a correct evaluation of their learning.
As what is mentioned above, I think that the healthiest way that ensure an accurate measurements of students educational operation is to enter both understanding of facts and explaining of idea and trends in evaluation process.
- Several years ago, Groveton College adopted an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated. Groveton's honor code replaced a system in which 60
- Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agr 60
- Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the following as media for communicating information.state which you consider to be the most effective.•Comics•Books•Radio•Television•Film•theatre 70
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager."One month ago, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one 50
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants."Recently, butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. This change, however, has had little im 50
Sentence: In all educational systems, one of the most controversial matters is the criteria that teachers should based their assessments on them .
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, past participle
Suggestion: Refer to should and based
Sentence: One aspect of this controversy is that somebody believe Educators should evaluate students' learning not on their takings of a fact but on their ability to explain the pertaining ideas and concepts that the fact is involved.
Description: The fragment somebody believe Educators is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace believe with verb, present tense, 3rd person singular
If an student has learnt
If a student has learnt
Sentence: It is possible that somebody is more successful in grasping abstract facts and others are more capable in explain relative trends and ideas.Both of them has their own merits and drawbacks.
Description: The token in is not usually followed by a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to in and explain
Sentence: Thus, only considering one aspect in students assessments could not be fair and fails to a correct evaluation of their learning.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to students and assessments
flaws:
Don't copy&paste topic, need to paraphrase the topic:
somebody believe “Educators should evaluate students’ learning not on their takings of a fact but on their ability to explain the pertaining ideas and concepts that the fact is involved”.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 12 15
No. of Words: 360 350
No. of Characters: 1788 1500
No. of Different Words: 177 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.356 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.967 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.892 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 131 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 113 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 79 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 30 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.46 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.351 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.582 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.081 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5