Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
In the education system, many students are encouraged to listen to their superiors and rarely question what they say. Usually, students are discouraged from questioning what they are taught, but instead are encouraged to accept it passively. However, it is my belief that students should sometimes question what they are taught, especially if they feel like their teacher is incorrect. Students should still respect their teachers, and they should not question every concept they are taught. Instead, they should be active thinkers in their education careers. Students need to learn how to think for themselves, and by questioning their educators when necessary, they can achieve this quality. I believe that there is a balance between accepting concepts passively and questioning them. Therefore, I neither agree or disagree with the statement that students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively.
To begin, if students just accept every concept they are taught throughout school, they will lose the ability to think freely for themselves. For example, in my AP Literature class in high school, my teacher encouraged us to speak up and give our opinions when discussing a piece of literature. Each novel or poem we read, we always analyzed and discussed them in class. If my teacher had just told us his opinions on what the meaning of each novel was, and our class never gave our input, we would lose valuable thinking abilities. By actively imputing our opinions, we gradually learned how to become more independent thinkers. Sometimes, our thoughts and opinions were way different than those of our teacher, but it helped lead to more discussion and understanding. Therefore, it is important that students do not just passively accept the concepts they are taught and should question what they are taught in certain cases.
However, there are some cases when students should not question what they are taught. A history class is a prime example of a situation when students should just accept the information they are taught. George Washington was America's first president. This statement is taught to every single American student early in their school careers. This statement is a fact that can not and will not ever change. For a student to question a historical fact is absurd and inappropriate. Science is another subject where students should limit what they question. Many concepts in science, such as the law of gravity, is static and will never change. Students need to learn when it is an appropriate time to challenge what they are taught and when to accept what they are taught.
Students should be active thinkers in their school careers, and they should develop skills to think independently. If a student continued to accept everything they are taught passively without thinking about it, they will end up losing the ability to think independently. As educators, teachers should encourage students to question what they are taught, respectfully, when it is appropriate. However, there are certain circumstances, such as historical facts, that should not be challenged because they can never change. In the education system, students should be taught when it is appropriate to input their challenging opinions and when to accept what they are taught passively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-10 | ashfaaq | 50 | view |
| 2022-07-04 | Vincent Samuel | 50 | view |
| 2022-06-07 | Evanica | 54 | view |
| 2021-12-14 | Gabriele_2605 | 79 | view |
| 2021-11-03 | saanri54321 | 66 | view |
- The following is a letter that recently appeared in the Oak City Gazette a local newspaper The primary function of the Committee for a Better Oak City is to advise the city government on how to make the best use of the city s limited budget However at som 60
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 54
- the insecticidal properties of DDT a whit crystalline compound were discovered in 1942 during world war II this pesticide was used to control the spread use of typhus and malaria then in the postwar era it began to be used extensively as an agricultural i
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 54
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 815, Rule ID: NEITHER_NOR[1]
Message: Use 'nor' with neither.
Suggestion: nor
...ioning them. Therefore, I neither agree or disagree with the statement that studen...
^^
Line 3, column 687, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...houghts and opinions were way different than those of our teacher, but it helped lea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 39.0 19.5258426966 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 74.0 33.0505617978 224% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2794.0 2235.4752809 125% => OK
No of words: 534.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23220973783 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75140732233 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.410112359551 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 828.9 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7553900403 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.3448275862 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4137931034 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.31034482759 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112021832777 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471885723982 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314472083187 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0861403968998 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196308292293 0.0667264976115 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 100.480337079 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.