Educators should take students' interests into account when planning the content of the courses they teach.
Education is a two way process- teaching by a tutor and learning both by a tutor and a student. As like a student should pay enough attention, a teacher or an educator should also pay the similar attention in the student's interest and need in every parts of teaching process. So I support with the author's recommendation about the need to account the student's interest by the educators while planning the content of the courses by teach.
Education is the backbone of the nation. It should be given top priority to every nation in order to get economic and social progress. In this modern generation, student's interests are dynamic. In order to acknowledge their changing interests, many top-notch universities in the world are recruiting the best educators to understand the student's positive interests and the process of implementing them in their education system. In that case, universities which lack enough budget and investment in this field is going behind- it is the case of most of the developing countries where there is huge flow of brain drain to the top universities of developed country. For example; in Nepal, millions of students in order to seek proper education of their choice, they migrate to the Europe, Australia, USA and other developed countries. This had the serious impact in the economy of Nepal because most of them do not depart to their countries, due to the apprehension of the bad effect of the education to their off-springs. So, to stop this brain drain, educators should take focus on student's interest on the planning of the courses.
In a teaching process, interests of the students are vital. An effective teaching-learning process is based on the fact how the students' need and interests are recognized by the teaching process. If the interests of the students are not recognized, then there will be discord and less effective teaching and learning in which thoughts of invention and creativity will be limited. So to enhance and strengthen the learning process, an educator should be always give top priority to the students' interest.
We always do better in the works of our interest. Similarly, if an educator plans any courses without accounting interests and needs of the students, students perhaps study well, can show good cooperation too, but surely their performance and interest on education will not be better when they are compelled to study out of their interest. This type of education system might discourage students in education and they might be derailed in their future. Moreover, even after huge investment in education, it cannot be significant impact in our development because of lack of both skilled and creative manpower.
Many might argue that students' interest can be harmful which can create negative impacts in education - so, educators should focus on other things expect student's interest. But aren't these misdeeds by students be corrected by implementing the needs and real and positive interest's of them. So, it is very important to give focus on all types of student's interest and implement them properly after cautiously accounting if these interests are the real needs.
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 50
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed. 50
- Claim: Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may well be proven false in the future.Reason: Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate. 83
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...teaching process. So I support with the authors recommendation about the need to accoun...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 430, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...menting them in their education system. In that case, universities which lack enou...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: Much might; A good deal of might
...f both skilled and creative manpower. Many might argue that students interest can be har...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 178, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...er things expect students interest. But arent these misdeeds by students be corrected...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, similarly, so, then, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2640.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 516.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11627906977 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84510004054 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443798449612 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 814.5 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.8805768274 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.18181818182 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405793526258 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139154062158 0.0831039109588 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940188199975 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.252079133278 0.150359130593 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667708741274 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.