Educators should take students' interests into account when planning the content of the courses they teach.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position

Essay topics:

Educators should take students' interests into account when planning the content of the courses they teach.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.

Unlike the students of past decades, the students of the current world as so vibrant and knowledgeable due to the incessant increase in technological advancements. According to the recommendation provided, educators should consider all the plausible ways to interrelate the subject with students' interest. But the extent to which this statement can be applied is still not discussed.

Firstly, the students of a course might have different interests of their own and the educator would be at haze to concentrate on which specific interests of students. However, the situation can be presumed that students of a particular course would have relatively common interests to their field. For example, students of computer science course can be interested in wide range of topics like networking, information security and data analytics which are related to their course.

In the meanwhile, the role of the educator is finding examples that could correlate students interest to the course subjects. The result would not only be an interactive season but also the students are groomed to meet the future world where every fields are inter-dependent. The best strategy for an educator to accomplish this way of educating people is to hunting for problems in real world that could be related to the course subjects.

But the demand for educators to understand and to have little knowledge in every field is at its acme. For instance, a computer programming educator must have enough insights on basic concepts of how hardware works: allowing the students to gain the knowledge of how hardware and software are bind together in the electronic devices. Instead, if a Mathematics educator is an erudite in all mathematical theories and statement but not able to relate it or apply to real world problem, it would leave a great negative impact on students' view.

In addition to educators being able to provide examples, the research and development skills of the students can also be increased. A great example is Sir Issac Newton who is prominently known as physicists. He formulated a mathematical theorem known as Principia that addresses all the holes of Helocentric universe. It is clear that every fields in the world are interrelated. In this case, Newton employed mathematics skills to solve a problem in physics.

Finally, since fields are dependent on each other, the responsibility of the educator is to search for examples and scenarios under which his/her subject can be implemented and thus help in innovation.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-14 srsridhar 66 view
2019-06-06 evanlu 66 view
2019-06-06 evanlu 66 view
2019-06-06 evanlu 50 view
2019-01-01 joh08403 58 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user niveda :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2123.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 405.0 442.535393258 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24197530864 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99092362702 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501234567901 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6596731466 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.944444444 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189682963501 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648407284986 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513358464484 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106766122484 0.150359130593 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505935598076 0.0667264976115 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.