Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
To gain depth knowledge about anything it is essential that first study ideas than learn facts related to topic. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that individuals could act wisely and make a sound decision if they encounter with reality and facts. In the following paragraphs, some convincing reasons will be delineated to elaborate my personal stance.
Moreover, the knowledge is powerful key and for knowledge facts as well as trends and ideas are important. The fact is incidents happen now or before whereas ideas, trends, and concepts are answered of questions like what, where, how and so on. For example, moon revolve around earth is a concept which is explained in books with scientific ideas, but the evidences which prove that moon revolve around earth is fact which explain its reliability. It can be understanding as at college level first students learn concepts and then they work on research which is facts-based study. This is a systematic way to gain optimum knowledge.
Furthermore, systematic study enhances learning of the children. A child first learns alphabetical sounds and after it learn how to draw an alphabet. When he learns all concepts then educators teach phonics and its fact about language. If the child first learns facts, then writing then he gets confused. Similarly, in primary school children learn about environment at superficial level and gradually they gain conceptual knowledge from text books. After getting conceptual knowledge teachers give assignment to teach them facts about environment. So, this technique helps to children to gain thorough knowledge about topic. It is like operating new machine at home, first we read manual then use it and collect facts. So, it is clear with example that facts should be teach later after studding the facts about topic.
Additionally, in olden days in India the rishi munis first told to their adherents to learn basic life skills like household work. After it they start teaching shlokas and ideas from holy books, then they teach about facts of life with examples and teachings of god. This is oldest technique to teach the students. The systematic study is called science and similar this technique is also having evidences and systematic method so, it is a scientific method. In every educational institute the educators should check concepts and ideas of students then teach the facts related to topic.
Finally, the facts prove that the statement is true. Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. This will definitely help to gain profound knowledge about any topic.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-31 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
2019-11-17 | faatir | 50 | view |
2019-11-17 | faatir | 50 | view |
2019-10-29 | arubhardwaj | 54 | view |
2019-07-28 | afsal2323 | 66 | view |
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 50
- Do you agree or disagree? The best way to improve the quality of education in a country is to increase the teachers’ salaries. 60
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the president of Amburg's Chamber of Commerce."Last October the city of Belleville installed high-intensity lighting in its central business district, and vandalism there declined within a month. T 55
- Some people think that they can learn better by themselves than with a teacher Others think that it is always better to have a teacher Which do you prefer Use specific reasons to develop your essay 70
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 23
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...t which explain its reliability. It can be understanding as at college level first students lear...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 451, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n conceptual knowledge from text books. After getting conceptual knowledge teachers g...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 771, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'taught'?
Suggestion: taught
...clear with example that facts should be teach later after studding the facts about to...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 273, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the oldest'.
Suggestion: is the oldest
...ith examples and teachings of god. This is oldest technique to teach the students. The sy...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, then, well, whereas, for example, as well as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2247.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 434.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17741935484 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56428161445 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58247651444 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502304147465 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0718221834 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.88 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.36 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64 5.21951772744 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279596153144 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815955692326 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116758427989 0.0758088955206 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188126932991 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110875640882 0.0667264976115 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.