Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
In the modern education, educators try to teach the theoretical foundation of the subjects: the ideas which are already formulated by other 'well-known' theorists. Amidst of teaching these pre-formed theories they often suppress the ideas and innovative approaches of students. It is seen that no approch is accurate, and all the theories counters with the situations from where there is no escape.
In other words, I am trying to argue here that, educators must encourage students to use the concepts they have studied but should give more focus on the facts.
There is a famous example of Albert Einestine here. He always tried to counter all the theories through the facts. He had enomerous record of making his teachers unanswered. It is facts only which helps the students to form the ideas. The notables just manupulated the facts to construct them into theories. Here, making the stand clear, I do not aggree to the notion of teaching facts after the ideas, trend and concepts. Rather, I advocate here to teach only facts to the students and leaving them to search for the ideas and formulating the trend.
Mostly theories demand an update when they are re-used for some purpose. It is facts which give the foundational clarity to the ideas. If someone is studying the theories only, then the educational sysmtem is making their mind a library of what is already achieved. But if the educators are giving the priority to teaching facts then it will train students for doing innovations.
Unfortunately, in real the education is more centered around the achievements of people rather than preparing students to achieve in future. The facts are important to clear to every student, teaching ideas can be a secondary task but the priority should be given to the facts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-31 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | faatir | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | faatir | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | arubhardwaj | 54 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | afsal2323 | 66 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 75
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reas 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 15, column 131, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ther than preparing students to achieve in future. The facts are important to clear to ev...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y should be given to the facts.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, then, well, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 297.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05050505051 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64654175229 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558922558923 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7270866355 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2352941176 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76470588235 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237530046883 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783368831102 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749633461106 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127254736502 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328420445403 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.