The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
The author of the issue highlights that the welfare of a society is a key factor when it comes to the effectiveness of country's leaders. Due to the controversial nature of this question, there is not a general argument on this issue. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that there are crowds of factors like trustworthy, integrity, being a commitment, hard-working and so forth, which determine a reliability of a leader in every given society. The following reasons will aptly substantiate my personal stance.
To commence with, although well-being of people in every society should be the first priority of leaders, it is trustworthy and integrity that represents effectiveness of a leader and identity of a society. Broadly speaking, it is the most required and the most admired quality of all people but especially for the effective leader. Indeed, the willingness and ability to trust the people that you look up is absolutely essential to your ability to perform at your very best. As a tangible example, when people in all around the world trust each other, they can improve their lives progressively and broaden their horizon. In this situation, not only can individuals reach the pinnacle of their life but also can witness a welfare society. To elucidate more on this issue, with trustworthy and integrity you have nothing to fear since you have nothing to hide and you will do the right things since you will have no guilt. That being so, trust is the best hallmark that could examine the well-being of a nation.
Another reason that should not go unnoticed is that being commitment through hard working could patronize people in order to experience a welfare society. Generally phrased, it is established beyond doubt that all leaders have been selected by people's vote and we all know that they have offered different plans in order to be accepted. So, being the commitment for their promises will determine to the extent a society is satisfied or whether people living in a society feel relax or not. Delve further into the issue, leaders should bend over backward and make efforts in order to develop their skills and try hard to provide an opportunity for members of societies to live in a welfare society.
However, what I alluded to above can't be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with the innumerable benefits it has, indisputably, the well-being of citizens in every nation largely depends on its effective leaders owing to the fact that leaders have the ability to lead a country because of their knowledge and ability to recognize trials and tribulations in societies. As a matter of fact, a leader could be effective just when people living in a society do not face any problems or difficulties. In fact, the more effective leader, the more well-being of a society.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that there are various aspects in the effectiveness of leaders and not until these factors take into consideration can a society make a big progress and experience welfare.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-08-01 | amirbahman | 66 | view |
| 2014-11-24 | aminn | 30 | view |
- Claim: people can understand the character of a society by men and women that a society chooses as its Heros or role models.Reason: Heros and role models are the society's highest ideal. 66
- When Stanley Park first opened, it was the largest, most heavily used the public park in town. It is still the largest park, but it is no longer heavily used. Video cameras mounted in the park's parking lots last month revealed the park's drop in populari 69
- TPO 35 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One can learn a lot about a person from the types of friends this person has. 73
- TPO43 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'essential'.
Suggestion: essential
...to trust the people that you look up is absolutely essential to your ability to perform at your very...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...y. However, what I alluded to above cant be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alo...
^^^^
Line 9, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a big progress and experience welfare.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, so, well, broadly speaking, in fact, as a matter of fact, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2536.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 509.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98231827112 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86005199369 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483300589391 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 812.7 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2581429004 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.8 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.45 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203624081809 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692560513977 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069947618622 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116363741131 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066906283762 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.