The effectiveness of a country's leaders is best measured by examining the well-being of that country's citizens.
The topic raises a thought-provoking issue of whether well-being of country’s citizen depends on how effective are country’s leader. Indisputably, the well-being of country is not directly proportional to country’s leadership. Nevertheless, country’s leaderships play a vital role in shaping any country. Thus I generally disagree with the idea that citizen well-being does not depend on leader of country and would argue that it plays a role in country well-being with three examples.
Firstly, the well-being of country depends upon the policy that are made by government and how effective are those policies. for example, if leader of country decides a policy in which any senior citizen of country will get discounts in their medical bills. This will help to improve their lifestyle.
Secondly, the country well-being not only depend upon their lifestyle or facilities provided by their leaders but also how other countries look upon them when they travel to other countries for any tour. For example, if any person from USA travelling to any other country for any tour will be welcomed and respected. This is because of their effective foreign policies made by their leaders.
Furthermore, the effectiveness of leader not only depends on policies made by them. But also are they being able to reach people and solve their problems. This creates a sense of trust among the people towards their leaders
In conclusion, although the citizens well-being is not directly related to country’s leadership but they play a vital role I shaping well-being of citizen. If the country’s leadership is not effective in their work it will affect the well-being of citizens. Hence, the country’s well-being can be measured by the effectiveness of country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | sapana | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | priyanayak | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | yesh | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | anvay | 50 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 75
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. 50
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books."We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base bec 83
- Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts. 50
- Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ay a vital role in shaping any country. Thus I generally disagree with the idea that...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...untry well-being with three examples. Firstly, the well-being of country depen...
^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...t and how effective are those policies. for example, if leader of country decides a...
^^^
Line 9, column 129, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...s leadership but they play a vital role I shaping well-being of citizen. If the c...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 279.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41218637993 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18091019097 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 215.323595506 60% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465949820789 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.8917806068 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73333333333 5.21951772744 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38621291855 0.243740707755 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176778913311 0.0831039109588 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108247839471 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245699552623 0.150359130593 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0995786827029 0.0667264976115 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.