Environmental protection policies should not be applicable to corporations, which generate significant financial and economic growth, even if such growth may have a negative impact on the environment.
The policy stated if implemented will have severe consequences to the environment around us and will lead to untimely destruction of global markets and economy. The policy proposes to remove all kinds of corporate social responsibilities towards the environment at even the cost of negative anomalies on the environment due to the financial or economic growth induced by these corporates.
CSR or corporate social responsibility has been a massive part of corporates decision making and functioning processes ever since renowned scientists have started warning the world about the collapse of the natural ecosystem that humans live in if further inaction and ignorance persists. Corporates may gain in the short term without such CSR liabilities however in the long run if the environment around us fails to sustain itself, all gains ceases to be useful. Every dollar of profit achieved by the corporate and added to the share market and the GDP of a country will be a dollar extra for the death of another tree somewhere in the world. For the people to enjoy the financial growth brought up by corporates, there needs to be a sustainable environment where everyone can coexist. If that fails, then there is no point of removing protect policies from corporations task list just on the basis that they bring about significant economic growth.
The policy concentrates on removing environmental protection liabilities from companies that generate significant revenue so there are no negative implications on that growth. However, most of the companies growing substantially to fall under this category will have processes in their production cycle that will involve severe pollution or damage to its surrounding environment. For example, corporates producing textiles have severely toxic wastewater effluent that they discharge in open water bodies that are severely damaging to any aquatic flora and fauna around such a corporate's production houses. Giant corporations Microsoft and Apple release toxic effluents from their factories producing these so-called 'revolutionary' machines promoting the betterment of human life. However, these machines and textiles and other private goods produced by corporations are for humans to consume and enjoy; but if the latter ceases to exists because of mother nature's reaction to severe atrocities committed by such corporations for decades, then we will have a pile of lifeless bodies after series of disasters and a pile of machinery, coexisting peacefully with the resurgent environment around them.
Protection policies can definitely sometimes be a burden on these large corporations and can be an added expense with safer machinery and additional safety measures implemented and can indeed lead these corporations to not achieve financial growth and not make revenue to their full potential. However, the current pandemic has shown us how dependable we are on a healthy environment for even the basics of day to day human functioning. Half the corporations around us achieving the policy's so-called significant financial and economic growth has ceased to exist as mother nature in the year 2020 promises to ravage the path of anyone who has compromised with her well being. What's the point of increased growth and development, when humans are hiding away in their small little rooms in the big enormous cities due to a virus ravaging away outside their windows?
- Environmental protection policies should not be applicable to corporations which generate significant financial and economic growth even if such growth may have a negative impact on the environment 66
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 54
- Children should be taught about the importance of money from a very young age because money is the most important determinant of social success 66
- Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position describe specific circumstances in which adopting the r 16
- One year ago Glengood Health Center in Turnville decided to start a health awareness program for its community Since that time Glengood s share of patients in the Turnville area has significantly increased Further a nationwide survey indicates that many p 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 931, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'exist'.
Suggestion: exist
... and enjoy; but if the latter ceases to exists because of mother natures reaction to s...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 443, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding corporations'?
Suggestion: the surrounding corporations
...s of day to day human functioning. Half the corporations around us achieving the policys so-called signifi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 677, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...ho has compromised with her well being. Whats the point of increased growth and devel...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, then, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2882.0 2235.4752809 129% => OK
No of words: 534.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39700374532 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95506092669 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 282.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52808988764 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 931.5 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.2887977959 60.3974514979 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 180.125 118.986275619 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.375 23.4991977007 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.21951772744 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350880671517 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11609439596 0.0831039109588 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779168585956 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224268557598 0.150359130593 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295897528336 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 14.1392134831 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 48.8420337079 60% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 12.1743820225 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 11.8971910112 181% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.