Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Law and rule are made by humans for humans, however, as every human being is different, so their perception, there is absolutely no certainty of making all rules to which no single being will have dissent. Hence even though claim seems to be ideal, this should be validated by lucid definitions of what “just” and “unjust” is! In general, however, laws which are always used for well being of society should be followed and which are against it should be disobeyed.
Every country's system is based on some general laws, which give guidelines for all citizens to have a balanced life. Tax laws are made to financially support a government which is running the country. Majority of people who are earning have to pay some part of their earnings to country, in form of taxes. Many countries have these rules in form of laws to make sure almost everyone is contributing to the system. Although skipping of tax payment of a single individual with a mediocre salary will not be affecting much to a system, skipping of taxes by a bunch of people having some resentments towards government will surely affect revenue generated from people. As government uses this revenue to fund themselves as well as to fund welfare of the country, it is more likely to cut down share of the welfare fund rather than the government fund. This situation will create monetary problems and ultimately the life of citizens will be affected (including those too who skipped taxes). So it is much necessary to follow laws and rules which are made to benefit society.
Not only it is a responsibility of the people to follow appropriate laws but also they have a moral duty to protest malign laws. Afganistan’s recent revolution is a quintessential example of how to tackle restraining regulations. An Afghani woman was never been allowed to drive an automobile neither was allowed to issue a driving license, maybe as a result of Afghan people’s men dominating mindset. Restricting woman to household and other chores was keeping Afganistan temporally behind whereas women were climbing new heights in rest of the world. Women fought this regulation and perhaps a religious belief over years. Ultimately on being successful to convince the government, first 12 woman driving licenses were permitted. This can be starting of a huge wave of revolution in Afghanistan, which has encouraged women to fight back other similar restricting regulations.
It may seem intelligible to distinguish between benign and malign laws, but it is not always that simple. Subjective nature of this laws makes it more complex. Not every law has widespread consensus. In a country like India, where caste is still a criterion for reservation, there is a law to support Scheduled castes, which were made during forming a constitution of India in mid of 20th century, when these castes were actually vulnerable. But now in 2018 as India is considered as one of the major developing countries in the world, no caste is as depraved as it were in mid 20th century. There are many reported cases of misusing this law by SC (Schedule Caste) people. Whereas many people are asking for a change in this law, SC people are striving their best to keep it intact. Both sides have their strong opinions to defend their positions and government is unable to come up with any solution over a dispute. As validity and necessity of this law are subjective, its tough to take one side and generalize the need of law.
In conclusion, on one hand, it is very fundamental right of a citizen to stand against unjust laws. That said, it is also a moral responsibility to follow and advocate just laws. However, a generalization of this claim will not be justified as terms “just” and “unjust” are subjective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Abhipray Singh | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | Jolly1111111 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | chapagain08 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Bonjourkmm | 58 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...hich no single being will have dissent. Hence even though claim seems to be ideal, th...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...lways that simple. Subjective nature of this laws makes it more complex. Not every l...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, still, well, whereas, as to, in conclusion, in general, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 49.0 19.5258426966 251% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 91.0 58.6224719101 155% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3158.0 2235.4752809 141% => OK
No of words: 636.0 442.535393258 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96540880503 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.02185627292 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96619569783 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 321.0 215.323595506 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504716981132 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 1019.7 704.065955056 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.559335064 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.896551724 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9310344828 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68965517241 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20021775165 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052525944829 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0453428546175 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11512836801 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039775561811 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 162.0 100.480337079 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.