The function of art is not to keep pace with science and technology but rather to provide an escape from these forces.
The speaker maintain two claims as the function of art is not to keep pace with science and technology. I concede with these claim to the extent that art does not necessarily need to keep pace with science and technology rather it has its own time and way of going forward. A for the second claim which states arts provide escapes from these forces it too extreme. Art usually does not intend provide escape form other worldly things rather it enhances the beauty of it and in many cases makes us feel more accepted in our own skin.
Firstly, Art does not necessarily need to keep pace with the advancing science and technology. But in many cases in can definitely reap the benefit to stay topical. For instance, photography is a form of art, which gives pleasure to both the capturer and the person seeing it. With time the advancement in technology and the change in camera have helped people to capture the minute details which were impossible earlier. Art in these case have willingly accepted and impute to the technology to extract the greater essence of art in its own pace.
At the same time no matter of technology can change the crudeness of sculpture and turn it into a two dimensional form to reach to the further corner of the world in seconds. Since it form of art is better perceived with physical presence. Technology can embolden the method of creating things but at the end it is the form of art and the artist community who decide which advancement to corroborate with and which one to set free.
The main purpose of art be it paintings, photography, music, sculpture or architecture every genre has its won source of relief and to offer to the audience. The intention of art is always to serve its audience and connect the artist along with it. It does not necessarily care about providing escape from other forces. The aura any sort of art creates for its recipient it always fascinating since it release the stress for the person. But it many cases it has to accept the technology or science in order to reach to the audience or by default to make it more good. Take the advancement of animation film, which incorporates extensive art with technology to present its audience a next level of phenomenal work. Also the film is watch din television or ay such medium which is technology itself.
In sum, it can be said the advancement in science and technology does not necessarily impair the art and crafts rather in many cases it nourishes it. Art is not here to compete with any other things not in terms of pace neither giving an escape route to its audience from technology. Art moves with it own pace and accept whatever is coming towards it with its sheer willingness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...further corner of the world in seconds. Since it form of art is better perceived with...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 715, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...dience a next level of phenomenal work. Also the film is watch din television or ay ...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch medium which is technology itself. In sum, it can be said the advancement i...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, second, so, as to, for instance, sort of, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2227.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 480.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63958333333 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54320223422 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445833333333 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 716.4 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5107535387 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.227272727 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435867070419 0.243740707755 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134847179774 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982431333099 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267280976778 0.150359130593 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137376738628 0.0667264976115 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.